Main Menu

WXV Trade Thread

Started by ossie85, August 28, 2013, 03:15:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Boomz

Dammit always forget to check the cap stuff.

kilbluff1985

So why did coaches vote against our Judd deal is he worth more then 16 or less not complaining just curious

ossie85

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 26, 2013, 01:31:29 PM
So why did coaches vote against our Judd deal is he worth more then 16 or less not complaining just curious

Not that many voted against (3 or less), but the reasons were generally Buenos Aires has a very old list.

Nails

flower that tbh

Trade 22
Buenos Aires trade: Pick 16
Tokyo trade: Chris Judd and Pick 90

Pick 90
Pick 16

Our list doesn't get older, it just gets more depth

Our pick number still changes, it's still 1 youth player

Also our biggest problem this year was depth. Instead of worrying about potential "future issues" it'd fix an ACTUAL LEGITIMATE CURRENT PROBLEM.


ossie85

Quote from: Nails on September 26, 2013, 01:47:15 PM
flower that tbh

Trade 22
Buenos Aires trade: Pick 16
Tokyo trade: Chris Judd and Pick 90

Pick 90
Pick 16

Our list doesn't get older, it just gets more depth

Our pick number still changes, it's still 1 youth player

Also our biggest problem this year was depth. Instead of worrying about potential "future issues" it'd fix an ACTUAL LEGITIMATE CURRENT PROBLEM.

Well, of course your list gets older - you have one more older player on your list, unless you are going to delist someone older than Judd you wouldn't otherwise delist.

But the trade wasn't voted down anyway

Master Q

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 26, 2013, 01:31:29 PM
So why did coaches vote against our Judd deal is he worth more then 16 or less not complaining just curious
Pick 16 > Judd IMO

Master Q

Prepare yourselves fellow coaches. A massive trade is on the cards  8)

My Chumps

Quote from: Master Q on September 26, 2013, 09:31:40 PM
Prepare yourselves fellow coaches. A massive trade is on the cards  8)
Bet you it gets rejected :P

Master Q

Quote from: My Chumps on September 26, 2013, 09:33:00 PM
Quote from: Master Q on September 26, 2013, 09:31:40 PM
Prepare yourselves fellow coaches. A massive trade is on the cards  8)
Bet you it gets rejected :P
It's completely even. Only reason why people could reject it is out of jealousy  :P

JBs-Hawks

Just putting some feelers out.  Gibbs could move at the right high price

Holz

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 26, 2013, 09:39:56 PM
Just putting some feelers out.  Gibbs could move at the right high price

Are you selling him as a mid only, if not I will wait till he becomes a mid only.

Holz

Dublin trade: Jack Darling, Jed Lamb, Brad Hill and Lachy Plowman
Cape Town trade: Jobe Watson


this deal was close last time, so this time we have dropped off watts and dunn from the deal. I feel Watts is quite abit better than dunn so this balances up the trade.

Watts averaged 84 after the bye and with roos he should improve. Dunn did average well but he isnt that good a player so who knows what roos will do with him.

elephants


Master Q

What is Cape Town's reason for doing the trade?

Holz

Quote from: Master Q on September 27, 2013, 02:23:22 PM
What is Cape Town's reason for doing the trade?

last time the reason was

"Darling + Watts have a lot of potential, and it sures up my back and forward lines which need the most work. Lamb hasn't solidified his spot in Sydney's best 21 as of yet, but I'm sure he'll develop into a solid forward/mid. Hill looks handy, although I doubt he'll end up scoring much as he's more of an impact player. Plowman should be a solid scorer for years to come.

Saying goodbye to Watson is extremely difficult. He's been an excellent servent to the club since I picked him up in the third round back in the original draft (excellent drafting there MC ). But, with my current list, I don't expect to win the premiership within the next 2 years when Watson will be averaging 115+. I may aswell trade him while he is at his highest value."