VC Loophole Rd 22

[_wato]

Haven't seen a thread yet, but I'm wondering what you boys out there are thinking?

Pendles/Swan into Ablett? Danger?

[Vinny]

I'm done for 2013 so Buddy into Selwood in hope Buddy kicks 10 and scores 190 :P

[_wato]

I'm done for 2013 so Buddy into Selwood in hope Buddy kicks 10 and scores 190 :P

Selwood mate? Against Sydney? Very risky, but may aswell go for it! Buddy scoring 190 would be alright, hahah!

So lucky I have no donuts this week! 0 trades left!

[Ringo]

Thinking Pendles into Jelwood myself so Ablett will probably go huge.

[Vinny]

Haha I have nothing to lose so might aswell. But seriously in the past few weeks, Jelly seems to be unstoppable.

Whilst getting the hard ball, he is kicking a few goals too :)

[Rusty00]

Thinking Pendles into Jelwood myself so Ablett will probably go huge.

This is what I'm thinking at the moment (including the part where Ablett will go huge  :-\ )

[billoddie74]

Loophole question:

Setting VC then (if VC scores big) using Heppell as C (to loophole), but have NO backline emergency (both on bench not playing), will I simply get a 0 for Heppell and VC score used?

What about Danger Vs Melbourne?

[Rusty00]

Loophole question:

Setting VC then (if VC scores big) using Heppell as C (to loophole), but have NO backline emergency (both on bench not playing), will I simply get a 0 for Heppell and VC score used?

Yes

What about Danger Vs Melbourne?

He's a tempting option

[GCSkiwi]

Can't decide between Swan into Jelwood or Jelwood into Ablett. Opponent will likely VC Swan (doesn't have Pendles).
Swan in to Jelwood winning for me (just!)