Clisby offered 3 week ban?

Started by jamfrank, August 12, 2013, 05:06:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jamfrank

I'm probably not the only to have Clisby at D8, and I just read on @AFL's twitter that he's been offered a three match sanction for rough conduct on Alex Sexton, despite not being named in the official MRP report. Anyone know anything about this incident?

LF

That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

jamfrank

Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

its me lads

"Mitch Clisby, Melbourne, has been charged after an investigation by the AFL Match Review Panel with a level four engaging in rough conduct Offence (425 demerit points, four-match sanction) for engaging in rough conduct against Alex Sexton, Gold Coast, during the fourth quarter of the Round 20 match between Melbourne and Gold Coast, played at Metricon Stadium on Saturday August 10, 2013.

In summary, he can accept a three-match sanction with an early plea.

Based on the investigation by the Match Review Panel, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), severe impact (four points) and body contact (one point). This is a total of seven activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Four Offence, drawing 425 demerit points and a four-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a 318.75 points and a three-match sanction."

I will probably trade now. Was going to trade McKenzie but might as well put him on the pine.

LF

Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

I have him and Wilson on the bench I was holding off on trading him because he still had some cash to make but now I'll trade him and bench Cannon as D7

jamfrank

Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

I have him and Wilson on the bench I was holding off on trading him because he still had some cash to make but now I'll trade him and bench Cannon as D7

Yeah, I've got Cannon and Shaw swapping between D6 and D7, with Clisby at D8. So I think I'll be right.

dirkdiggler

Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:06:31 PM
I'm probably not the only to have Clisby at D8, and I just read on @AFL's twitter that he's been offered a three match sanction for rough conduct on Alex Sexton, despite not being named in the official MRP report. Anyone know anything about this incident?

Awesome...i've got him at D7...
I may trade him via Staker for a fwd spud

BGK

Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:25:58 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

I have him and Wilson on the bench I was holding off on trading him because he still had some cash to make but now I'll trade him and bench Cannon as D7

Yeah, I've got Cannon and Shaw swapping between D6 and D7, with Clisby at D8. So I think I'll be right.

Surely you'll be looking to free up his cash tied up to upgrade elsewhere?

Clisby's suspension was always coming, after Sexton's shoulder was dislocated in the push and shove there was only one course of action. Silly stuff if you ask me and sometimes i feel it's a bit of a blight on the game.

jamfrank

Quote from: BGK on August 12, 2013, 06:01:29 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:25:58 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

I have him and Wilson on the bench I was holding off on trading him because he still had some cash to make but now I'll trade him and bench Cannon as D7

Yeah, I've got Cannon and Shaw swapping between D6 and D7, with Clisby at D8. So I think I'll be right.

Surely you'll be looking to free up his cash tied up to upgrade elsewhere?

Clisby's suspension was always coming, after Sexton's shoulder was dislocated in the push and shove there was only one course of action. Silly stuff if you ask me and sometimes i feel it's a bit of a blight on the game.

Yeah. I realised instead of trading Staker to Johnston, I can trade clisby instead 8)

BGK

Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 07:27:21 PM
Quote from: BGK on August 12, 2013, 06:01:29 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:25:58 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 12, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on August 12, 2013, 05:08:40 PM
That must have been the other incident they were talking about
And that there totally stuffs my SC team
DT he now needs to be traded

Eh, I reckon I can hold him through the finals - I'm not going to waste a trade on him unless one of my other defenders goes down. I only use one emergency per line, and it's never been Clisby.

I have him and Wilson on the bench I was holding off on trading him because he still had some cash to make but now I'll trade him and bench Cannon as D7

Yeah, I've got Cannon and Shaw swapping between D6 and D7, with Clisby at D8. So I think I'll be right.

Surely you'll be looking to free up his cash tied up to upgrade elsewhere?

Clisby's suspension was always coming, after Sexton's shoulder was dislocated in the push and shove there was only one course of action. Silly stuff if you ask me and sometimes i feel it's a bit of a blight on the game.

Yeah. I realised instead of trading Staker to Johnston, I can trade clisby instead 8)

You've just made me rethink my trades, thanks

RookieDTer

Thank flower I have Pittard at least...

If a D is not named this week I'll trade Clisby, but otherwise I'll take the risk of getting a 50 from my Emergency.