With Ibbo out...I'm Stumped - Help

[pinochio]

God, Hep, Gibbs, Ibbo, Eski, Mckenzie (Grimes, Thurlow)
Swan, Ablett, Pendles, Barlow, Jack, ROK, Jelwood, Stants (Titch, Hrovat)
Cox, Berger (Nicholls, Naismith)
SJ, Lewis, Stokes, Rocky, Dusty, Cloke (Staker, Bennedy)
17,500

Was going the standard nicholls/titch > beams/grundy

now with ibbo out i think my plans need to change!


ibbo/titch >burgoyne/griff
OR
nicholls/ibbo > hanley/grundy
OR
ibbo/titch > beamer/johnston


anything else...??

[CFC 1979]

if you mean ibbotson he's been named to play
:o
has made the 22 on Freo's website

[BGK]

I don't think you have a choice but to go Hanley and Grundy. It gives you cover in all lines. The last thing you want is for your match to be decided by a late out with no cover.

if you mean ibbotson he's been named to play
:o
has made the 22 on Freo's website

Are you sure?

[pinochio]

pretty sure ibbo is not playing

I don't think you have a choice but to go Hanley and Grundy. It gives you cover in all lines. The last thing you want is for your match to be decided by a late out with no cover.

berger and cox will play (hopefully lolz)

not having beams costs me so many points


what about ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer? with a bit of dpp staker action

[RookieDTer]

http://www.afl.com.au/match-centre/2013/20/fre-v-gws doesnt show Ibbo as playing!

[nickstiges]

Ibbo removed from the squad completely for Silvagni.

[pommyadam]

if you mean ibbotson he's been named to play
:o
has made the 22 on Freo's website

can you show me what website you're reading,
this is from the Freo site itself

[CFC 1979]

sorry you are dead right guys
he is out

20 min's ago they had him in the team and on the field, now he's gone and confirmed out

[BGK]

pretty sure ibbo is not playing

I don't think you have a choice but to go Hanley and Grundy. It gives you cover in all lines. The last thing you want is for your match to be decided by a late out with no cover.

berger and cox will play (hopefully lolz)

not having beams costs me so many points


what about ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer? with a bit of dpp staker action

Personally I'd prefer to go Hanley and Grundy but your option is still good.

[RookieDTer]

I'm going Ibbo to Enright now....
Then Nichols to Gorringe.

Leaving TMitch still in my team.... Sigh.

[pinochio]

pretty sure ibbo is not playing

I don't think you have a choice but to go Hanley and Grundy. It gives you cover in all lines. The last thing you want is for your match to be decided by a late out with no cover.

berger and cox will play (hopefully lolz)

not having beams costs me so many points


what about ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer? with a bit of dpp staker action

Personally I'd prefer to go Hanley and Grundy but your option is still good.

that would mean fielding stants which is almost like hitting yourself in the face with a frying pan  :-\

down to:
ibbo/nicholls > hanley/grundy - means i play stants
or
ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer - means i have no ruck cover this week


tough call???

[RookieDTer]

ibbo/tich for you i reckon.

For me, effectively, I have to play TMitch, Stanton or Clisby.... picking stanton.

[pinochio]

ibbo/tich for you i reckon.

For me, effectively, I have to play TMitch, Stanton or Clisby.... picking stanton.

ye man stants out of the lot but then he will stink it up as he does so often! :(

what about stants > watto and ibbo > hanley

over the beams/johnston trade?

[BGK]

pretty sure ibbo is not playing

I don't think you have a choice but to go Hanley and Grundy. It gives you cover in all lines. The last thing you want is for your match to be decided by a late out with no cover.

berger and cox will play (hopefully lolz)

not having beams costs me so many points


what about ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer? with a bit of dpp staker action

Personally I'd prefer to go Hanley and Grundy but your option is still good.

that would mean fielding stants which is almost like hitting yourself in the face with a frying pan  :-\

down to:
ibbo/nicholls > hanley/grundy - means i play stants
or
ibbo/titch > johnston/beamer - means i have no ruck cover this week


tough call???

Your mind sounds pretty made up. If you're that dead set about not fielding Stanton then you only have 1 option.

[pinochio]

got a new trade idea :)

stants/ibbo > watson/hanley

??