With 4 trades left should I do the single or double trade this week?

[ben_020285]

Team is as follows:

DEF: Goddard, Hanley, Heppell, Gibbs, Thompson, Hartlett (Ibbotson, Wilson)
MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Griffen, Selwood, Cotchin, JPK, Fyfe, T Mitchell (Saunders, K Martin)
RUC: Goldstein, Minson (Currie, McBean)
FWD: Walker, Cox, Rockliff, Martin, JJK, Stevie J (Staker, B Kennedy)

4 trades left and $370,300 in the bank.

I am ranked 36 but I'm 460 points away from the leader so won't be able to win the major prize with just the 4 rounds left.

I am in 4 Qualifying Finals and 1 Elmination Final this week.

I am definitely going to trade out K Martin for Watson this week. I am also thinking about trading Staker for either Bartel or Roughead. If I am to trade Staker it would have to be this week because he has a massive breakeven this week so will have a huge price drop and I may not be able to afford a decent upgrade if I tried to upgrade him next week. This would give me premium coverage in my DEF and FWD with T Mitchell as my coverage in the MIDS.

So with 4 trades left should I just trade out K Martin for Watson this week and save the remaining 3 trades for any injuries or restings over the last 3 weeks?
Or should I go the double trade which would leave me with 2 trades and get rid of Staker for either Bartel or Roughy? If you think I should trade out Staker this week then who would you choose out of Bartel or Roughy?

All advice appreciated and cheered.

[Rusty00]

Team is as follows:

DEF: Goddard, Hanley, Heppell, Gibbs, Thompson, Hartlett (Ibbotson, Wilson)
MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Griffen, Selwood, Cotchin, JPK, Fyfe, T Mitchell (Saunders, K Martin)
RUC: Goldstein, Minson (Currie, McBean)
FWD: Walker, Cox, Rockliff, Martin, JJK, Stevie J (Staker, B Kennedy)

4 trades left and $370,300 in the bank.

I am ranked 36 but I'm 460 points away from the leader so won't be able to win the major prize with just the 4 rounds left.

I am in 4 Qualifying Finals and 1 Elmination Final this week.

I am definitely going to trade out K Martin for Watson this week. I am also thinking about trading Staker for either Bartel or Roughead. If I am to trade Staker it would have to be this week because he has a massive breakeven this week so will have a huge price drop and I may not be able to afford a decent upgrade if I tried to upgrade him next week. This would give me premium coverage in my DEF and FWD with T Mitchell as my coverage in the MIDS.

So with 4 trades left should I just trade out K Martin for Watson this week and save the remaining 3 trades for any injuries or restings over the last 3 weeks?
Or should I go the double trade which would leave me with 2 trades and get rid of Staker for either Bartel or Roughy? If you think I should trade out Staker this week then who would you choose out of Bartel or Roughy?

All advice appreciated and cheered.

I think go the 2 trades this week. You have good coverage and if you upgrade Staker then you'll have cover in the forwards and rucks (through Cox/McBean).

Personally I'm not convinced with Bartel or Roughy. I think Roughy will score well this week, but not sure about the rest of games and I'm generally not sure about Bartel's scoring output at the moment. Others for consideration are Pavlich, Rioli, NRoo, Boomer.

[FonFatty]

Cracking side mate.
If I was in your position I would go the 1 trade. Id be more inclined to pick up K Jack though.
Id also have the temptation to do 2 trades as well, trade Titchell to another prem (danger, swan) and bench JPK and loophole him if he goes big.

[ben_020285]

Team is as follows:

DEF: Goddard, Hanley, Heppell, Gibbs, Thompson, Hartlett (Ibbotson, Wilson)
MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Griffen, Selwood, Cotchin, JPK, Fyfe, T Mitchell (Saunders, K Martin)
RUC: Goldstein, Minson (Currie, McBean)
FWD: Walker, Cox, Rockliff, Martin, JJK, Stevie J (Staker, B Kennedy)

4 trades left and $370,300 in the bank.

I am ranked 36 but I'm 460 points away from the leader so won't be able to win the major prize with just the 4 rounds left.

I am in 4 Qualifying Finals and 1 Elmination Final this week.

I am definitely going to trade out K Martin for Watson this week. I am also thinking about trading Staker for either Bartel or Roughead. If I am to trade Staker it would have to be this week because he has a massive breakeven this week so will have a huge price drop and I may not be able to afford a decent upgrade if I tried to upgrade him next week. This would give me premium coverage in my DEF and FWD with T Mitchell as my coverage in the MIDS.

So with 4 trades left should I just trade out K Martin for Watson this week and save the remaining 3 trades for any injuries or restings over the last 3 weeks?
Or should I go the double trade which would leave me with 2 trades and get rid of Staker for either Bartel or Roughy? If you think I should trade out Staker this week then who would you choose out of Bartel or Roughy?

All advice appreciated and cheered.

I think go the 2 trades this week. You have good coverage and if you upgrade Staker then you'll have cover in the forwards and rucks (through Cox/McBean).

Personally I'm not convinced with Bartel or Roughy. I think Roughy will score well this week, but not sure about the rest of games and I'm generally not sure about Bartel's scoring output at the moment. Others for consideration are Pavlich, Rioli, NRoo, Boomer.

Thanks mate. I'm not really feeling Pav, Rioli or N Roo but I would love to get Boomer. Unfortunately he is out of my reach though due to a lack of cash.

[ben_020285]

Cracking side mate.
If I was in your position I would go the 1 trade. Id be more inclined to pick up K Jack though.
Id also have the temptation to do 2 trades as well, trade Titchell to another prem (danger, swan) and bench JPK and loophole him if he goes big.

Cheers mate. K Jack is another good option but I can't go past Watson's value. I would love to be able to bring in a super premium mid for T Mitch but after the Watson trade I would only have $518,000 to spend so wouldn't be able to afford a super premium.