Main Menu

2013 British Review

Started by Ringo, August 06, 2013, 04:05:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige

Yeah, I do agree that PSD players should be able to be put on either list.

Colliwobblers

Quote from: NigeyS on October 16, 2013, 06:44:25 PM
Yeah, I do agree that PSD players should be able to be put on either list.

BXVS PSD players being all players available in the  BXVS rookie/ps draft EXCEPT AFL Rookie draft picked players... who must go on our rookie list.

and AFL ND players being the only players in the BXVS national draft pool and all having to go on our senior lists.

think that is the way to go but happy as Ringo says to get other ideas, and if any make sense may even make BXVS draft better or more interesting but the above by default i think makes the most  sense....

Football Factory

Between Retirements and Delistings im going to lose 10 players   :o .. hoping J-Pod will get picked up tho

Justin Bieber

It doesn't matter, the Badgers have the premiership sewn up

Football Factory


kilbluff1985

Quote from: whatlez on October 16, 2013, 07:17:28 PM
It doesn't matter, the Badgers have the premiership sewn up

You were saying that 12 months ago to

Justin Bieber

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 16, 2013, 07:29:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 16, 2013, 07:17:28 PM
It doesn't matter, the Badgers have the premiership sewn up

You were saying that 12 months ago to
Not as confident. I was scared of the Bombers 12 months ago.

kilbluff1985

Well we should make the 8 for at least the next 5 years now

All it's going to take for us to be immediately dangerous is if one or two of the many forwards we are going to draft have decent first years rest of our lines are very good

Vinny

Where can you guys see Owls finishing?

We have picks #7 & #9 remember.

Nige

Quote from: vinny on October 16, 2013, 07:49:54 PM
Where can you guys see Owls finishing?

We have picks #7 & #9 remember.

Because two first year players are really gonna help your ladder position.  ::)

Ringo

keep the banter to the discussion thread please and leave this thread to discuss ways to improve our comp and discuss ideas.

Vinny

Quote from: NigeyS on October 16, 2013, 08:01:18 PM
Quote from: vinny on October 16, 2013, 07:49:54 PM
Where can you guys see Owls finishing?

We have picks #7 & #9 remember.

Because two first year players are really gonna help your ladder position.  ::)

:(

At #7 & #9 this year in the actual draft were Vlastuin and Wines.

In BXV draft: Grundy and Stringer.

They would help any teams ladder position.


(Okay sorry, no more Ringo.)

kilbluff1985

do people think we actually need 45 players on our lists?

just bringing this up as there might not be many players drafted in the AFL This year so i think shortening BXV lists requirements could prevent any hassles now and in future

what i think is maybe have a list size suggestion like lists have to have between 37-45 players you don't have to have players on your rookie list they can go onto your senior list but if 41 players are on your senior list then they must go on rookie list

or just scrap the rookie list i don't like it

Colliwobblers

rook list is great, makes it AFL like.

as for reducing list size i dont think that solves the problem at all, we have 40 in AXVS and are in exact same position.

the only thing that fixes this problem is reducing the rounds in the BXVS national draft to 4 maybe 5. probably 4.

now we have done all the pick trading this is all but impossible to do.

so Ringo needs to come up with a solution, but if the list was less the only difference would be clubs might not need to or want to take as many nat draft picks each season.

but that will also happen naturally, as clubs refine their lists and cut the dead wood, each season should see late nat picks less and less likely to be used.

as for this season, it is a quandary, but Ringo will sort it.

Justin Bieber

I reckon 42 is a good number.