2013 British Review

[JBs-Hawks]

Shouldn't have to delist 7 players thats way too much!

[Nige]

Shouldn't have to delist 7 players thats way too much!

4 or 5 is probably more reasonable.

[Justin Bieber]

Yeah I got players who may come good like Curren

[Vinny]

Yeah minimum if 4 sounds good.

[Ringo]

Need to agree on number of players to delist as this will dictate how many rounds in each draft we will have,  Have picked 7 basically for 4 rounds in National Draft and 3 in Rookie Draft.

Could change to 5 with a 3 and 2 picks in each trade.

[kilbluff1985]

You don't have to delist any do you ? Just means you can't draft anyone until you do

[Ringo]

That can be done KB but from an Administrative point of view need to work out how many official draft rounds are required so coaches know which picks they can trade. No use trading pick 73 say if only 4 rounds are listed for National Draft.
It is interesting at the moment though 4 of the clubs through retirements and delistings have de-listed 7 players or more.

[Colliwobblers]

Ringo, just to clarify if a team holds onto delisted players in the hope they will be picked up by other clubs (AFL) in the AFL Preseason draft, and they are not picked up and are therefore on a BXVS list but not on an AFL list will that team be given a pick at the end of the BXVS rookie/preseson draft to replace him?

Also do I get a compensation pick for premiership fatigue?  :o

[Ringo]

Ringo, just to clarify if a team holds onto delisted players in the hope they will be picked up by other clubs (AFL) in the AFL Preseason draft, and they are not picked up and are therefore on a BXVS list but not on an AFL list will that team be given a pick at the end of the BXVS rookie/preseson draft to replace him?

Also do I get a compensation pick for premiership fatigue?  :o

Not covered in the rules Colli,  but I will rule that compensation picks will be available after the Rookie Draft is complete if a team has players still not on an AFL list. 

[kilbluff1985]

As the rules stand at the moment If you want to use 2 picks in the rookie draft you will either have to delist another rookie or promote one to your Senior list using a National draft pick.

This is one rule that I am looking at for next year but at the moment do not know how to improve it.  Please feel free to offer suggestions on this in the 2013 Review thread,

cool mate assumed as much

well what i was think is lets say you have 4 guys on your rookie list but want to keep them but not promote onto senior list but still want to use your rookie draft 1st rounder you could have the option on passing on your last required pick in the NAT Draft so would be going into the rookie draft with 40 senior players and 4 rookies and then you can use your first rookie pick to make your senior list have 41 players

makes sense?

[Colliwobblers]

should be able to put PSD pick players on your senior list OR rookie list, and rookie draft players can ONLY  go on your rookie list and ND players can ONLY go on your senior list,

[Vinny]

How are we going to pick PSD players if our list must be full after the NAT draft?

[Colliwobblers]

How are we going to pick PSD players if our list must be full after the NAT draft?

thats what i am saying :)

they will have to go on your rookie list the way the rules are now.

[Vinny]

Oh haha, my bad. I think it would be better if instead of saying "Your senior list must be full after the NAT draft." It should be full after all the drafts have been completed. Plus how are we even meant to get PSD picks?  :P

[Ringo]

Keep the ideas coming guys as this is the purpose of this thread to discuss and refine rules for the betterment of the comp.

Even if you have opposing views please feel free to post so I get a consensus of what is wanted before putting out to vote.