Main Menu

2013 British Review

Started by Ringo, August 06, 2013, 04:05:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige

#135
Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 11:15:48 AM
I am sorry what was that wood spooner? ;)

Cloke is flowering tool, I don't even care!
'wood spooner'... 'is flowering tool'...

Do you even English?  :P

I inherited the team champ, it was too late to get it off the bottom.

Won half our games after I took over.  ;)



nrich102

I like the idea of vc x1.5.

kilbluff1985

i guess i'm not against VC 1.5 just only really helps the strong teams

Vinny

Quote from: NigeyS on January 04, 2014, 11:24:46 AM
Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 11:15:48 AM
I am sorry what was that wood spooner? ;)

Cloke is flowering tool, I don't even care!
'wood spooner'... 'flowering tool'...

Do you even English?  :P

I inherited the team champ, it was too late to get it off the bottom.

Won half our games after I took over.  ;)

Shut up Grammar Nazi ;)

Haha you just had to name a team!

Nige

Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 11:45:27 AM
Quote from: NigeyS on January 04, 2014, 11:24:46 AM
Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 11:15:48 AM
I am sorry what was that wood spooner? ;)

Cloke is flowering tool, I don't even care!
'wood spooner'... 'flowering tool'...

Do you even English?  :P

I inherited the team champ, it was too late to get it off the bottom.

Won half our games after I took over.  ;)

Shut up Grammar Nazi ;)

Haha you just had to name a team!
So did the former coach, and you, and the next guy.  :P

Vinny

Actually the previous coach traded, you joined half way so you had no effect and just had to name the team! :P

Nige

Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 12:02:58 PM
Actually the previous coach traded, you joined half way so you had no effect and just had to name the team! :P
Not like I could do anything else with like four rounds to go.  :P

Vinny

Quote from: NigeyS on January 04, 2014, 12:17:29 PM
Quote from: vinny on January 04, 2014, 12:02:58 PM
Actually the previous coach traded, you joined half way so you had no effect and just had to name the team! :P
Not like I could do anything else with like four rounds to go.  :P

Haha right so it was only four rounds.

ossie85

Sorry, against the 1.5 Vc rule.

Happy with Hga lowest scoring player twice

Happy with 20 bonus points


Rolling lock out sounds fine for those long rounds

Great stuff ringo

Colliwobblers

Quote from: Ringo on January 04, 2014, 10:37:46 AM
Coaches now that holiday period is coming to an end a couple of further matters for discussion and review.

All these are my views only and open to full discussion:

How do we feel about modifying the VC score by a factor of .5 eg if your VC scores 100 then it becomes 150. Means retaining the deputy VC though should your VC be called to be Captain or VC a late out. Just a thought.

We do this in AXVS and it is popular however i am neither for or against making the change in British.

Are you happy with current HGA advantage where lowest scoring player of Home team is doubled for HGA.  Are there other options?

I think the HGA bonus should be more consistent, your lowest scoring player could score anything from 1 to 70 which makes the HGA vary wildly, this is not realistic, a HGA should be the same week in week out or close enough, so I favour a % of the total score. In saying that having double lowest players score does add another degree of interest to the comp by making you actually care about what your lowest scoring player is likely to score and setting your team with this in mind...

I am keen to maintain the 20 Bonus points for updating by 9:00am the day after final match, Do I need to extend this deadline to say midday to allow for those coaches that work at night?  Reason for keeping this is it currently provides me with a double check of scores.

Happy with the 20 point bonus, though I have never missed out on it I would not like to lose a game because of it, i think the time you allow for score updates is more than fair.

There are 3 rounds over 2 weeks this year which currently have a rolling lock out.  With the change to emergency and sub rule is it appropriate to continue rolling lock out for these rounds?

Unsure on this one, need it explained to me better :)

We had a number of awards for the year as per this thread:
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,74754.0.html
Are there any that should be deleted or any that should be added?

Will look into this and give feedback, love what you have done so far tho.

Feel free to add comments

Football Factory

The HGA is good how it is ... 4 clubs share the MCG ..4 clubs share Etihad

Sometimes you get a crap score for your HGA which is realistic imo.

example:  Collingwood play Hawthorn at the MCG .. HGA ?  not really

Colliwobblers

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on January 04, 2014, 06:55:29 PM
The HGA is good how it is ... 4 clubs share the MCG ..4 clubs share Etihad

Sometimes you get a crap score for your HGA which is realistic imo.

example:  Collingwood play Hawthorn at the MCG .. HGA ?  not really

Good point FF.

Ringo

#147
With the mini contoversy the sub rule has caused thoughts on no Partial rolling lock outs at all.

What this means is all teams are locked at the first bounce of the round and for those few rounds that are over 2 weeks including byes no adjustment allowed in second week. We have no rule set regarding Partial lock outs so seriously considering this rule as a disincentive to those thinking of rorting the sub rule. With 4 emergencies one for each line should be no reason to have the partial lock outs.

kilbluff1985


Vinny