Ask Nrich - Finals

Started by nrich102, August 06, 2013, 07:02:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RookieDTer

Quote from: nrich102 on August 07, 2013, 08:03:37 AM
Quote from: RookieDTer on August 07, 2013, 07:57:43 AM
Play JOM or Stanton at M8? One will be M8, one will be M9.
JOM.
Cheers, that is how my team is currently set, so I guess I must agree!

Rockyr

I have a few underperforming defenders, I am trying to bolster my midfield and only have $53.5K in the bank.  This part of my team is as follows:


DEF - Goddard, Heppell, Henderson with Gibbs, Malceski & Ibbotson underperforming (Clisby, B Wilson as Emerg)

MID - Swan, Ablett, Beams, Barlow, ROK, Cotchin with Priddis & Ebert underperforming (T Mitchell, McKenzie as Emerg)


I think that Hanley is probably the pick of the defenders with Enright another option, although I am concerned about him being rested.  I don't

I want Griffin, but can't really afford him.  I think that Tom Liberatore is showing exceptional recent form and Fyfe could also be handy.

Do you think that Hanley for Malceski and Liba for Priddis are the best options?

nrich102

Quote from: Rockyr on August 07, 2013, 01:14:13 PM
I have a few underperforming defenders, I am trying to bolster my midfield and only have $53.5K in the bank.  This part of my team is as follows:


DEF - Goddard, Heppell, Henderson with Gibbs, Malceski & Ibbotson underperforming (Clisby, B Wilson as Emerg)

MID - Swan, Ablett, Beams, Barlow, ROK, Cotchin with Priddis & Ebert underperforming (T Mitchell, McKenzie as Emerg)


I think that Hanley is probably the pick of the defenders with Enright another option, although I am concerned about him being rested.  I don't

I want Griffin, but can't really afford him.  I think that Tom Liberatore is showing exceptional recent form and Fyfe could also be handy.

Do you think that Hanley for Malceski and Liba for Priddis are the best options?
I'd actually be trying to get rid of Ibbotson over Malceski. But Hanley is better than them both. The second trade is good.

Glort

I've posted this elsewhere but I would love your opinion......

I traded Cotch to Stanton earlier in the year and now I'm thinking of swapping them back   
It's Stanton > beams with Wellingham at M9 Or..... Stanton > Cotchin with Watson M9...
Depending on ibbo's injury and if I stay with the thought of keeping Harbow and Grimes  My opponent this week has Cotch and no Grimes or Harbrow....
Damn this wound up sounding like a cry for help! But I'm leaning towards Beams/Wellingham

My current team is:
God, Hep, Ibbo, Gibbs, Harbrow, Grimes...... Clisby, Thurlow
Ablett, Swan, Pendels, Barlow, ROK, Griff, Jelwood, Stanton....... Bartel, Martin
Cox, Kruez....... Grundy, 89kdude
Rocky, SJ, NRoo, JJK, Martin, Franklin...... Neead, Staker
159k in the bank
I will be moving Bartel Fwd and thinking of turning Franklin/staker to Mid bench cover. What do you think? Any help would be appreciated!

nrich102

Quote from: Glort on August 07, 2013, 06:48:09 PM
I've posted this elsewhere but I would love your opinion......

I traded Cotch to Stanton earlier in the year and now I'm thinking of swapping them back   
It's Stanton > beams with Wellingham at M9 Or..... Stanton > Cotchin with Watson M9...
Depending on ibbo's injury and if I stay with the thought of keeping Harbow and Grimes  My opponent this week has Cotch and no Grimes or Harbrow....
Damn this wound up sounding like a cry for help! But I'm leaning towards Beams/Wellingham

My current team is:
God, Hep, Ibbo, Gibbs, Harbrow, Grimes...... Clisby, Thurlow
Ablett, Swan, Pendels, Barlow, ROK, Griff, Jelwood, Stanton....... Bartel, Martin
Cox, Kruez....... Grundy, 89kdude
Rocky, SJ, NRoo, JJK, Martin, Franklin...... Neead, Staker
159k in the bank
I will be moving Bartel Fwd and thinking of turning Franklin/staker to Mid bench cover. What do you think? Any help would be appreciated!
I'd do Beams/Wellinghan.

Glort

Thanks mate! I always get nervous this time of year ;D

pommyadam

Sandi or Minson as R2?
and then is it worth bringing in Wright as F7 (the Adelaide variety) - or hold Staker and then degrade for cash this week?

nrich102

Quote from: pommyadam on August 07, 2013, 09:15:41 PM
Sandi or Minson as R2?
and then is it worth bringing in Wright as F7 (the Adelaide variety) - or hold Staker and then degrade for cash this week?
Minson as R2. Do you have any cover in you forwards, other than Staker? If you do, I'd downgrade Staker, but if you do I'd probably just hang on to him.

Tenfold

I have to play one of Danny Stanley or Jack Grimes which one would you go?

nrich102

Quote from: Tenfold on August 08, 2013, 03:12:53 PM
I have to play one of Danny Stanley or Jack Grimes which one would you go?
I'm going to say Jack Grimes.

Tenfold


fidou

I can bring in two mids, which two?

One of Griffen or Selwood and One of Okeefe or Jack

nrich102

Quote from: fidou on August 09, 2013, 06:52:45 AM
I can bring in two mids, which two?

One of Griffen or Selwood and One of Okeefe or Jack
Which Selwood? Probably Griffen over them both though. Jack over O'Keefe

fidou

Quote from: nrich102 on August 09, 2013, 06:57:47 AM
Quote from: fidou on August 09, 2013, 06:52:45 AM
I can bring in two mids, which two?

One of Griffen or Selwood and One of Okeefe or Jack
Which Selwood? Probably Griffen over them both though. Jack over O'Keefe
sorry Geelong Selwood. Yep I was leaning towards Griffin and Jack also .....thanks

nrich102

Quote from: fidou on August 09, 2013, 07:21:12 AM
Quote from: nrich102 on August 09, 2013, 06:57:47 AM
Quote from: fidou on August 09, 2013, 06:52:45 AM
I can bring in two mids, which two?

One of Griffen or Selwood and One of Okeefe or Jack
Which Selwood? Probably Griffen over them both though. Jack over O'Keefe
sorry Geelong Selwood. Yep I was leaning towards Griffin and Jack also .....thanks
I probably didn't need to know what Selwood it was :P It was still Griffen over them both :P