question

[woofy]

Just wondering...

Thinking of using loophole on Roughead this week. If he scores well ill put Currie on field.

Cox, Currie - Roughead (E), Leuenberger

Now if I have Ablett as VC and I want to take his score and put the C on Currie will Roughead become my C?

[Spite]

Just wondering...

Thinking of using loophole on Roughead this week. If he scores well ill put Currie on field.

Cox, Currie - Roughead (E), Leuenberger

Now if I have Ablett as VC and I want to take his score and put the C on Currie will Roughead become my C?

No he won't. Can confirm because I have done this before

[GoLions]

Roughead won't get doubled, Ablett would.

On a side note, what is your forward line? Because I would definitely want Leuey in my starting 22.

[woofy]

Roughead won't get doubled, Ablett would.

On a side note, what is your forward line? Because I would definitely want Leuey in my starting 22.

Cool thanks for the clarification.

Well ruck and fwdline looks like this ATM:

Cox, Berger (Nicholls, Currie)
Dusty, Johnson, Rocky, JJK, Roughy, Buddy (Zorko, Oxley)

Plan is to go Nicholls > Walker then upgrade Zorko to Minson later on.

[Rusty00]

I would go Buddy to Walker and then Zorko to Minson later on if the books balance.

That way you still have a solid ruck setup at the moment and improves your forward line as well.