LaHug's Captains - Round 19 - Request your own week! (Fluctuating Top 5)

[pommyadam]

Jelwood and SJ please

[essendon2]

Titchell and Cotchin please!

[LaHug]

Sorry about the delay guys but the rest of these will be up tomorrow. I have uni in the morning and had a relatively late bball game. I'll get them done though :)

[Ricochet]

Sidey please LH

[its me lads]

Disappointing to see Dangers stats down, was thinking of bringing him ni. BTW Mr.Craig requested Scooter, not me.  :P I don't want to seem greedy

[stew42]

Cox (shhhhhhhh)...
Cheers :)

[LaHug]

Still got 9 requests to go but I'm getting through them... Need to break for dinner now.

[j959]

Still got 9 requests to go but I'm getting through them... Need to break for dinner now.

what?!? where's the committment to DT?!?!  :o    :-\

just teasing, thanks Huggy bear!  ;)

[Alka]

ROK please. Thinking he could have a good week.

[LaHug]

All requests are done!
The poll has been reset with the weekly top 5 poll!
The results for the coffee poll are in the original post!

[essendon2]

Thanks for doing them mate,
Just one thing; you've written "Jack" instead of "Mitchell" for my request ;)


Btw, does that mean you don't think Mitchell --> Beams isn't worth while?

[LaHug]

Thanks for doing them mate,
Just one thing; you've written "Jack" instead of "Mitchell" for my request ;)


Btw, does that mean you don't think Mitchell --> Beams isn't worth while?

Haha, whoops! I tend to do a fair bit of dodgy copy/paste...

It really depends on what else you have. I think Beams will score more than Mitchell but, more importantly, he's less likely to score poorly. That being said, Beams is very expensive and Mitchell might be worth keeping around. What does the rest of your midfield look like?

[essendon2]

Thanks for doing them mate,
Just one thing; you've written "Jack" instead of "Mitchell" for my request ;)


Btw, does that mean you don't think Mitchell --> Beams isn't worth while?

Haha, whoops! I tend to do a fair bit of dodgy copy/paste...

It really depends on what else you have. I think Beams will score more than Mitchell but, more importantly, he's less likely to score poorly. That being said, Beams is very expensive and Mitchell might be worth keeping around. What does the rest of your midfield look like?

Swan, Ablett, Pendles, Barlow, Montagna, Jelwood, Cotchin, Titchell (Hutchings, Hrovat)

[LaHug]

Thanks for doing them mate,
Just one thing; you've written "Jack" instead of "Mitchell" for my request ;)


Btw, does that mean you don't think Mitchell --> Beams isn't worth while?

Haha, whoops! I tend to do a fair bit of dodgy copy/paste...

It really depends on what else you have. I think Beams will score more than Mitchell but, more importantly, he's less likely to score poorly. That being said, Beams is very expensive and Mitchell might be worth keeping around. What does the rest of your midfield look like?

Swan, Ablett, Pendles, Barlow, Montagna, Jelwood, Cotchin, Titchell (Hutchings, Hrovat)

Can you afford Hutchings or Hrovat to him instead?

[essendon2]

Thanks for doing them mate,
Just one thing; you've written "Jack" instead of "Mitchell" for my request ;)


Btw, does that mean you don't think Mitchell --> Beams isn't worth while?

Haha, whoops! I tend to do a fair bit of dodgy copy/paste...

It really depends on what else you have. I think Beams will score more than Mitchell but, more importantly, he's less likely to score poorly. That being said, Beams is very expensive and Mitchell might be worth keeping around. What does the rest of your midfield look like?

Swan, Ablett, Pendles, Barlow, Montagna, Jelwood, Cotchin, Titchell (Hutchings, Hrovat)

Can you afford Hutchings or Hrovat to him instead?

yeah, but then I have to bench one of cotchin and Mitchell.
I'd rather just trade the worse one of the two, since Hutchings as E is sufficient