Scott Lycett vs Basement priced forward rookie

Started by m_zulian, July 31, 2013, 07:28:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scott Lycett FWD ($162300) or non-playing basment priced FWD rookie ($89,300)

Scott Lycett ($162,300)
2 (33.3%)
Non-playing basement priced FWD rookie ($89,300)
4 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 0

Voting closed: August 05, 2013, 07:28:38 PM

m_zulian

I have Hartlett to cover for Hanley and Robbo as forward bench cover. After my Swallow trade I'm considering switching Staker to backline and trade out Clisby to either West Coast Fwd Scott Lycett ($162,300) or non-playing basment priced forward rookie such as Oxley ($89,300) for F8. This allows me to have Staker as backline bench cover.
Lycett, on the bubble scored 69 on the weekend and has a b/e of 18. In the absence of Nic Nat he was used forward and sparingly in the ruck but comes with an elevated price.
As this is my second trade, I'm not relying on the cash for this round but future rounds. So, which is the better option?

fertalong

Chances are you will never actually cash lycett in or have to rely on his score, so it doesn't even matter.
Go for the cheapest option to make the most cash.