Is anyone trading 'IN' Jack Grimes this week?

Started by Hagebear, July 30, 2013, 05:45:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Hagebear

Just seeing if anyone is as silly as me this week?

nrich102


Hagebear

Quote from: nrich102 on July 30, 2013, 06:20:04 AM
No thanks

Hahaha standard response I was expecting haha looking forward to revisiting this post in a couple of weeks. Only planning on agin him for 2 weeks (GWS and GC) then Hanley should be back.

nrich102

Quote from: Hagebear on July 30, 2013, 06:23:13 AM
Quote from: nrich102 on July 30, 2013, 06:20:04 AM
No thanks

Hahaha standard response I was expecting haha looking forward to revisiting this post in a couple of weeks. Only planning on agin him for 2 weeks (GWS and GC) then Hanley should be back.
I don't think I'll ever bring him in. He's way to injury prone, and his scoring is shower atm

Hagebear

Quote from: nrich102 on July 30, 2013, 06:33:45 AM
Quote from: Hagebear on July 30, 2013, 06:23:13 AM
Quote from: nrich102 on July 30, 2013, 06:20:04 AM
No thanks

Hahaha standard response I was expecting haha looking forward to revisiting this post in a couple of weeks. Only planning on agin him for 2 weeks (GWS and GC) then Hanley should be back.
I don't think I'll ever bring him in. He's way to injury prone, and his scoring is shower atm

I agree. Taking a fair risk. But with how defenders have been this year knowing I'll only have him for 2 weeks it could work.

Ricochet

I would be. When he is up and going he is a top 5 defender easily

strikes91


elephants

GC and GWS is a lovely next two opponents! Surely he won't be tagging in that one.

I would be tempted but I've got bigger fish to fry!

Tominator

I got him two weeks ago... I want to trade him but GC and GWS means he miiiiiiiight do OK

But Ellis > Grimes was a terrible move .....

Toga

I've got him a few weeks ago so that i have 7 premium defenders... Will be playing him for his easy next two weeks before Hanley comes back, then he can probably sit on my bench.

j959

Quote from: strikes91 on July 30, 2013, 10:02:53 PM
im trading him out
+1

i haven't seen Melb's last 2 games but stuff I've read says Neil Craig has been using him as a tagger ...  :'(   :o   :-X   ;)

Hagebear

Quote from: j959 on July 31, 2013, 12:25:40 PM
Quote from: strikes91 on July 30, 2013, 10:02:53 PM
im trading him out
+1

i haven't seen Melb's last 2 games but stuff I've read says Neil Craig has been using him as a tagger ...  :'(   :o   :-X   ;)

Yeh he tagged last week but not too much to tag against GWS and GC.

Andrew

Quote from: Hagebear on August 01, 2013, 12:42:28 AM
Quote from: j959 on July 31, 2013, 12:25:40 PM
i haven't seen Melb's last 2 games but stuff I've read says Neil Craig has been using him as a tagger ...  :'(   :o   :-X   ;)

Yeh he tagged last week but not too much to tag against GWS and GC.


Ward and Ablett? If he tags this week I'll probably ditch him, as won't he be lined up for Ablett v GC? It'd be an interesting matchup?

Hagebear

Quote from: Andrew on August 01, 2013, 01:13:20 AM
Quote from: Hagebear on August 01, 2013, 12:42:28 AM
Quote from: j959 on July 31, 2013, 12:25:40 PM
i haven't seen Melb's last 2 games but stuff I've read says Neil Craig has been using him as a tagger ...  :'(   :o   :-X   ;)

Yeh he tagged last week but not too much to tag against GWS and GC.


Ward and Ablett? If he tags this week I'll probably ditch him, as won't he be lined up for Ablett v GC? It'd be an interesting matchup?

Well if Grimes goes to Ablett it could be a world record score!! I think the last couple of weeks has showed Jack Grimes clearly isn't a tagger and Melbourne need him to win the footy.