Main Menu

2013/14 TRADE PERIOD

Started by Ringo, July 27, 2013, 09:54:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

elephants

Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 07, 2013, 12:40:39 PM
surely no one genuinely believes cox will play more time in the ruck in 2014 than he will fwd?

Its not based on 2014 though, its based on 2013 when he spent most of his time in the ruck. I'm unhappy too but I see where VS are coming from :-\

Colliwobblers

Quote from: elephants on December 08, 2013, 02:18:48 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 07, 2013, 12:40:39 PM
surely no one genuinely believes cox will play more time in the ruck in 2014 than he will fwd?

Its not based on 2014 though, its based on 2013 when he spent most of his time in the ruck. I'm unhappy too but I see where VS are coming from :-\

it is the positions for 2014 if they base it completely on what happened in 2013 then they need a slap.... doesn't concern me i recruited cox purely to use as a ruck as i felt roughead would lose ruck status, so suits me fine if he went fwd only then i would be in trouble.
but i just think it is a bad call to make him ruck only on their behalf

elephants

Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 08, 2013, 02:29:59 PM
Quote from: elephants on December 08, 2013, 02:18:48 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 07, 2013, 12:40:39 PM
surely no one genuinely believes cox will play more time in the ruck in 2014 than he will fwd?

Its not based on 2014 though, its based on 2013 when he spent most of his time in the ruck. I'm unhappy too but I see where VS are coming from :-\

it is the positions for 2014 if they base it completely on what happened in 2013 then they need a slap.... doesn't concern me i recruited cox purely to use as a ruck as i felt roughead would lose ruck status, so suits me fine if he went fwd only then i would be in trouble.
but i just think it is a bad call to make him ruck only on their behalf

I am 90% sure they don't take too many projections into account. Think you might need to slap em haha :P

The one that really gets under my paintwork is Daisy losing fwd dpp ::) He hardly played this season and when he did it was deep fwd or across halfback!!

Colliwobblers

see that with daisy has to be them taking into consideration his transfer to carlton and the fact he will be used as a mid.

nothing to do with 2013

same with gibbs

Vinny

Anyone reckon we should start a ladder predictions thread?

elephants

Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 08, 2013, 03:02:30 PM
see that with daisy has to be them taking into consideration his transfer to carlton and the fact he will be used as a mid.

nothing to do with 2013

same with gibbs

Yeah it proves it must come into some consideration I guess but it does underline their inconsistencies.

PowerBug

Quote from: vinny on December 08, 2013, 05:18:26 PM
Anyone reckon we should start a ladder predictions thread?
1. Hedgehogs
2. Hawks
3. Badgers
...
...
18.Hurricanes
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

elephants

Quote from: PowerBug on December 08, 2013, 05:46:57 PM
Quote from: vinny on December 08, 2013, 05:18:26 PM
Anyone reckon we should start a ladder predictions thread?
1. Hedgehogs
2. Hawks
3. Badgers
...
...
18.Hurricanes

Hedgehogs top?? Wow, we must be doing something right then :P

kilbluff1985


Justin Bieber

Badgers third? We have D6's better than most teams top defender and M6 who would captain teams.

And the best ruckman...

Colliwobblers

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 08, 2013, 06:02:33 PM
Werewolves?

same as last season, look back through the thread, the werewolves were nowhere in anyones ladder calculations.

we shall again enjoy gobbling them up one by one, only with luck we won't start this season with 3 or 4 of our starting XV not able to line up for the first few rounds.

elephants

Quote from: whatlez on December 08, 2013, 06:14:55 PM
Badgers third? We have D6's better than most teams top defender and M6 who would captain teams.

And the best ruckman...

Doesn't matter, still chokers.

Justin Bieber

Quote from: elephants on December 08, 2013, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: whatlez on December 08, 2013, 06:14:55 PM
Badgers third? We have D6's better than most teams top defender and M6 who would captain teams.

And the best ruckman...

Doesn't matter, still chokers.
Doesn't matter. Predictions for ladder position.

Nige


elephants

Quote from: whatlez on December 08, 2013, 06:22:51 PM
Quote from: elephants on December 08, 2013, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: whatlez on December 08, 2013, 06:14:55 PM
Badgers third? We have D6's better than most teams top defender and M6 who would captain teams.

And the best ruckman...
Doesn't matter, still chokers.
Doesn't matter. Predictions for ladder position.
Doesn't matter, still chokers.