Which FWD & MID?

Started by underdog, July 26, 2013, 12:44:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

underdog

So i'm trading out Nic Nat and Goodes this week.  Can trade them in either of their positions, but feel the best value is in getting a Mid and a Fwd.  Could hold onto Nic Nat and use Nicholls as cover, but feel he's pretty cooked for the year, so best to move him on.  Sitting second in my league, but could still miss the 8 if I drop the last two games! (really tight!)

Got 6 trades left and about $250K coin, which gives me $1,155,200 to spend on two players.  Can go fairly top shelf (not quite on both spots though), but wouldn't mind keeping a little in the bank to upgrade Hanley if his hand doesn't come good, or Danger or anyone else who breaks down.

What are my best options/combinations for MID and FWDs?  I'm thinking between Cotchin, Barlow, Griffin, Jack? for the midfield, and Stevie J, Walker for the forwards.  Can't do some of those combinations, because of cash.

I'm mainly trying to decide between Cotchin and Stevie J, or Griffin and Walker.

Any opinion for who to get in those spots (or different trade/position options) would be greatly appreciated! (would cheer if I could, but can't do that yet...)

Current Team:
DEF: Goddard, Shaw, Gibbs, Hanley*, Hartlett, Mackenzie - Clisby, Colqhoun
MID: Ablett, Pendles, Swan, J Selwood, Danger*, JPK, Swallow, T Mitchell - Goodes, Crouch
RUCK: Cox, Ryder - Nicholls, Rowe
FWD: Roughead, Rockliff, Martin, JJK, Nic Nat, Franklin - Staker, Lee

*once back from injury

Typhnn

SJ is definately a must in the FWD line...

Barlow, Cotchin would be the next two on the list, as you can't afford griffen...!!

underdog

Yeah, Griffin or Barlow and Stevie J up front would probably be the best option, but if I go stevie J in the FWDs, I only have $571k to spend in the Mid.  Cotchin is the obvious candidate for mine if I get SJ up front, or maybe Jack or S Mitchell even?

I guess it comes down to SJ vs Griffin as the first pick, then get best available in the other position after that