Pearce Hanley suspected broken hand

Started by Colty, July 23, 2013, 04:43:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jesty

2 trades every week would take out the strategy involved would it not. Basically everyone would end up with pretty much the same teams. ??? Limited trades is good IMO.

Bentekezzz

Quote from: tbagrocks on July 23, 2013, 05:22:33 PM
Yes well this will hurt! Not sure with two trades and Clisby on bench!
Excatly the same! also have nic nat aswell - im screwed.

Ringo

I am looking on the bright side and have a definite loop hole now for a couple of weeks. I had Docherty as D8 so in all liklihood he will play in Hanleys absence giving me extra coverage with Staker now on field.

Mat0369

Quote from: Bully on July 23, 2013, 05:43:15 PM
So did Danger and he could be out for some time.

Danger couldn't lift his arms, the telling pasage of play with Danger was when he reached out to receive the handpass and the pressure of the ball was too much for his arm, there is a difference. Hanley ran out the game with no sign of the injury after those couple of minutes, also a small fracture can normally heal relatively quickly. Hanley actually took the glove off (probably due to swelling/bruising after the injury and went on to star

Quote from: Jesty on July 23, 2013, 05:44:37 PM
2 trades every week would take out the strategy involved would it not. Basically everyone would end up with pretty much the same teams. ??? Limited trades is good IMO.

Agreed

Quote from: Bentekezzz on July 23, 2013, 05:48:12 PM
Excatly the same! also have nic nat aswell - im screwed.

I have one more trade then you and I am also carrying Nic Nat. I would rather take the punt with Clisby over the next two weeks then burn a trade on Hanley.

Jackross10

With 3 trades left. I might take a risk and go Ricky Henderson ? DPP with Staker..

Jesty

Hope B Wilson comes back for the Eagles so I can do the loophole with him and Clisby.

roo boys!

Means I might have to look a bit further for a replacement for Goodes!

Will affect many.

Quote from: Mat0369 on July 23, 2013, 05:56:03 PM

Quote from: Jesty on July 23, 2013, 05:44:37 PM
2 trades every week would take out the strategy involved would it not. Basically everyone would end up with pretty much the same teams. ??? Limited trades is good IMO.

Agreed

Yep, I agree as well. Keep a bit of strategy in the game, after all, it is a game...

Jesty

And I'm saying that with 2 trades left Haha.

roo boys!

Quote from: Jesty on July 23, 2013, 06:04:45 PM
And I'm saying that with 2 trades left Haha.
Ditto, well 3 now but 2 after trading Goodes.

frenzy


Maggie May

Quote from: roo boys! on July 23, 2013, 06:06:15 PM
Quote from: Jesty on July 23, 2013, 06:04:45 PM
And I'm saying that with 2 trades left Haha.
Ditto, well 3 now but 2 after trading Goodes.

I'm in the same boat.  I have bench cover in Clisby and Brown, so am going to hold Hanley and hope he comes good.  Am thinking Goodes to Henderson to dpp with Staker.  That will leave me two trades left.

HotTiges

I'd be happy with 30 trades I think next season but I reckon sc will want to keep the casual player interested especially if they run out of trades with quite a few rounds left..

Vinny

SC I think is fine with 30 trades. I reckon you have to earn your ranking by being strategic and actually using your trades wisely. If we had two trades a week - Most of the strategy is out the window. Just IMO. :)

Hazza09

I just bought Hanley for Terlich last week! FML

Jesty

Quote from: Maggie May on July 23, 2013, 06:32:15 PM
I'm in the same boat.  I have bench cover in Clisby and Brown, so am going to hold Hanley and hope he comes good.  Am thinking Goodes to Henderson to dpp with Staker.  That will leave me two trades left.

Id probably go Henderson too if I had to. Not many pull out a 101, 85 106, 160 from there arse without having some talent.