Ripped off by SC Calculations

[RoughRed]

The rules for using emergencies in SC say
"Where there's more than one emergency available in a certain position and only one is required, the lowest scoring emergency will be used"
My opponent in my league (FFSC - AFL - 2K13 (960699)) had SJ on the field and Franklyn and Cox as FWD emergencies
SJ ... 0
Franklyn ... 0
Cox ... 70
He received the 70 from the Cox score .... how does that work???  ??? >:(

[Jroo]

It says the lowest scoring emergency WHICH PLAYS. That's why he received Cox's score.

[Bully]

It's playing emergencies, you didn't get ripped off.

[RoughRed]

It says the lowest scoring emergency WHICH PLAYS. That's why he received Cox's score.

ok see that now - did not realise that Franklyn was not named
Thanks

[upthemaidens]

It says the lowest scoring emergency WHICH PLAYS. That's why he received Cox's score.

ok see that now - did not realise that Franklyn was not named
Thanks

So you assumed Franklin played and happened to score zero, instead of the more likely outcome of him not being named?   Maybe a simple check of the facts before making this thread was in order.
 

[Vicious Sandwhich Attack]

That said.... Credit where credits due. RR sitting 17th in this league and still cares enough to get upset that he lost a close one. At least he's  sticking it out....

Wish you had won that one RR, then I'd be top :)