Is H. Shaw worth it?

[essendon2]

Hartlett --> J. Grimes is certainly locked in! very happy with that :)


Now, I have Terlich left over...

Option 1:
I have 429k to spend, the best option is Heath Shaw.

Option 2:
Go Daw --> McBean
&
next week turn Terlich --> anyone

[rider]

I looked at him too, he has a low breakeven and an easy couple of games that he should rack up in. I would do it, but decided to go for Grimes for longterm as heater is bound to miss a couple at some point, and i'm backing grimes to finish strong and injury free. My backs are finished so couldn't get them both in...

I went Hartlet>Grimes now who to bench????? Gibsis the out of form player lol but do I have the balls?

Def: God, Hep, Gibs, Enright, Eski, Grimes, Hanley, Clisby

[essendon2]

I looked at him too, he has a low breakeven and an easy couple of games that he should rack up in. I would do it, but decided to go for Grimes for longterm as heater is bound to miss a couple at some point, and i'm backing grimes to finish strong and injury free. My backs are finished so couldn't get them both in...

I went Hartlet>Grimes now who to bench????? Gibsis the out of form player lol but do I have the balls?

Def: God, Hep, Gibs, Enright, Eski, Grimes, Hanley, Clisby

I'd leave Hanley or Grimes on the bench

[LaHug]

It depends on who you already have in your backs. If you don't have God, Hepp, or Gibbs, it might be worth waiting a week and getting one of them. If you have all 3, I'd definitely get Shaw this week! Even if you don't have all 3, Shaw's probably worth it with current form and two expansion clubs coming up.

EDIT: accidentally wrote "rucks" instead of "backs"

[steve99]

Hartlett --> J. Grimes is certainly locked in! very happy with that :)


Now, I have Terlich left over...

Option 1:
I have 429k to spend, the best option is Heath Shaw.

Option 2:
Go Daw --> McBean
&
next week turn Terlich --> anyone

I say get Shaw in (as im doing the exact same trades  :) )
I figure at this stage of the season when teams are as good as complete that even if he does run into some trouble a sideways to someone else shouldnt be to difficult, and with $'s in the bank being easy enough to generate, most people will probably have a spare premo on the bench anyway in a few weeks time.
He has one of the biggest ceilings of any defender and has two games coming up where he could take advantage...

[essendon2]

It depends on who you already have in your backs. If you don't have God, Hepp, or Gibbs, it might be worth waiting a week and getting one of them. If you have all 3, I'd definitely get Shaw this week! Even if you don't have all 3, Shaw's probably worth it with current form and two expansion clubs coming up.

EDIT: accidentally wrote "rucks" instead of "backs"

Current backs: (before trades)

Goddard, Gibbs, Heppell, Hanley, Hartlett, Terlich (Staker, Clisby)

[LaHug]

It depends on who you already have in your backs. If you don't have God, Hepp, or Gibbs, it might be worth waiting a week and getting one of them. If you have all 3, I'd definitely get Shaw this week! Even if you don't have all 3, Shaw's probably worth it with current form and two expansion clubs coming up.

EDIT: accidentally wrote "rucks" instead of "backs"

Current backs: (before trades)

Goddard, Gibbs, Heppell, Hanley, Hartlett, Terlich (Staker, Clisby)

Given that, I'd say Shaw is definitely worth it and I love your trade idea!

[rider]

I looked at him too, he has a low breakeven and an easy couple of games that he should rack up in. I would do it, but decided to go for Grimes for longterm as heater is bound to miss a couple at some point, and i'm backing grimes to finish strong and injury free. My backs are finished so couldn't get them both in...

I went Hartlet>Grimes now who to bench????? Gibsis the out of form player lol but do I have the balls?

Def: God, Hep, Gibs, Enright, Eski, Grimes, Hanley, Clisby

I'd leave Hanley or Grimes on the bench

Why oh why did I listen too you Gibs on 14 for the half. Benched Hanley he will get 150 now shower shower shower could have done with that boost over other teams in the top 50.

[starz]

Unlucky mate. Well done for being in the top 50 hopefully you had gaz captain

[essendon2]

Unlucky mate. Well done for being in the top 50 hopefully you had gaz captain

Hartlett --> Grimes cost me 14 points
&
Terlich --> Shaw cost me 10 :o


I think I'll be wanting to trade Shaw out this week ::)

[rider]

had swan captain, ok, hanley on the pine and gibbs and grimes on the field.... atleast roo was a good inclusion.

[gstarm]

Unlucky mate. Well done for being in the top 50 hopefully you had gaz captain

Hartlett --> Grimes cost me 14 points
&
Terlich --> Shaw cost me 10 :o


I think I'll be trading Shaw out this week ::)

poor bugger, i bet ya spent forever making those decisions aswell.

[Windigo]

Shaw is one of those players that is up & down.

Feast or famine with him.  :P

[jamfrank]

Shaw is one of those players that is up & down.

Feast or famine with him.  :P

Shaw against GWS this week? Will we be seeing a feastival or not? ???