Dangerfield Ruled out for 4

Started by essendon2, July 17, 2013, 03:22:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

essendon2

SEN 1116 ‏@SENNews 11m
@Adelaide_FC 's faint final hopes have been delivered a huge blow with Dangerfield out for 4 weeks http://sen.lu/12IW5Wm  #AFL

tbagrocks

Fair to say season's over, might keep in SC for finals but have to trade DT :-[

This will bring in a kid called Mitch Grigg who I liken to Roger James, a great downgrade if you want cash! As he should play those four games Danger misses

Let's see if i'm right!

antonc


browny_wce

Boyd, Watson, Danger, Cotchin...

My midfield has been roo-ted this year!!

RookieDTer

Have pendles, gablett, swan, mcveigh, jack, barlow, tmitch,  (jom, hutchings), dangerfield

Who do i trade in for Dangerfield!?

.Leaning towards Stanton, but tempting just to play JOM. Wouldn't want to drop 25 points per week though.

means i wont be able to get Malceski in or Nick Roo in this week. Will still go terlich to grimes though

Hagebear



tbagrocks

Barlow, Boak, Scooter

Or ....................

Get frogging Dayne Beams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bigdaddyg

Quote from: RookieDTer on July 17, 2013, 07:10:42 PM
Have pendles, gablett, swan, mcveigh, jack, barlow, tmitch,  (jom, hutchings), dangerfield

Who do i trade in for Dangerfield!?

.Leaning towards Stanton, but tempting just to play JOM. Wouldn't want to drop 25 points per week though.

means i wont be able to get Malceski in or Nick Roo in this week. Will still go terlich to grimes though

ROK for Dangerfield

RookieDTer

McVeigh, Jack, ROK, TMitch.... too many?

Let alone Malceski in Def as well.

Holz

Quote from: tbagrocks on July 17, 2013, 05:04:34 PM
Fair to say season's over, might keep in SC for finals but have to trade DT :-[

This will bring in a kid called Mitch Grigg who I liken to Roger James, a great downgrade if you want cash! As he should play those four games Danger misses

Let's see if i'm right!

Grigg is a gun if given a chance will kill it like Mitchell and JOM

AlexIsOnFire

I brought in Stanton for Danger, was going to go JSelwood, but I think Joel will be rested soon, so Stants I want 160 against GWS this weekend

Ricochet

Quote from: AlexIsOnFire on July 18, 2013, 07:35:54 AM
I brought in Stanton for Danger, was going to go JSelwood, but I think Joel will be rested soon, so Stants I want 160 against GWS this weekend
Be careful with Stants. No Watson means he will cop 90% of the attention now