Quick poll: Ablett, Swan or Pendles VC

Started by tommy10, July 12, 2013, 07:30:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who for VC loophole?

Swan
2 (10%)
Pendles
16 (80%)
Ablett
2 (10%)

Total Members Voted: 0

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

poolboybob

#15
July 12, 2013, 10:27:57 PM
155 before scaling... hello captain Docherty!

batt

#16
July 12, 2013, 10:31:04 PM
Quote from: batt on July 12, 2013, 07:47:23 PM
I feel Danger going huge tonight but don't have the guts to take the VC off Pendles.
Switched to Danger 10 seconds before lockout.

>:(

eaglesman

#17
July 12, 2013, 10:32:01 PM
hello captain thurlow!

Ringo

#18
July 12, 2013, 10:38:22 PM
Quote from: poolboybob on July 12, 2013, 10:27:57 PM
155 before scaling... hello captain Docherty!
Same for me

tor01doc

#19
July 12, 2013, 10:41:31 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on July 12, 2013, 10:32:01 PM
hello captain thurlow!

Hey, lay off.

He's my captain!

poolboybob

#20
July 12, 2013, 10:42:46 PM
If Spuddy doesn't play then I'll chuck the Big C on him. Don't want to risk it with Docherty still named as emergency.

connor

#21
July 12, 2013, 10:43:37 PM
called it, funny though how pendles scored those two goals(game sealing i would say) and only had 2 more SC than DT??

eaglesman

#22
July 12, 2013, 10:45:51 PM
Quote from: connor on July 12, 2013, 10:43:37 PM
called it, funny though how pendles scored those two goals(game sealing i would say) and only had 2 more SC than DT??

agree was expecting more

poolboybob

#23
July 12, 2013, 10:46:44 PM
Yeah I thought Pendles would have ended up with a bigger score. Though they only had him on 95, so he did have a 60 point fourth quarter. Could've seen him with an even higher score that quarter though; he was amazing.

Slashers

#24
July 12, 2013, 10:47:35 PM
Buddy better not play! I have no one else to use... :-[

connor

#25
July 12, 2013, 10:49:19 PM
but had a 58 point DT quarter which in my mind means that chanpion data don't think anything he did effected the game in collingwoods way. am i right?

Jesty

#26
July 12, 2013, 10:55:55 PM
You guys changed my mind to pendles early in the thread. Cheers.

tommy10

#27
July 12, 2013, 11:12:46 PM
Quote from: batt on July 12, 2013, 10:31:04 PM
Quote from: batt on July 12, 2013, 07:47:23 PM
I feel Danger going huge tonight but don't have the guts to take the VC off Pendles.
Switched to Danger 10 seconds before lockout.

>:(
Why or why batt. Didn't we convince you? I'm glad I left t VC on Pendles and even more stoked that Danger's score was low as my opp has him!! Gonna get him 2-3 weeks time  ;)
Quote from: Jesty on July 12, 2013, 10:55:55 PM
You guys changed my mind to pendles early in the thread. Cheers.
No probs Jesty, I was initially thinking Swan or Jelwood. So happy I stuck with Pendles!!

batt

#28
July 13, 2013, 12:34:22 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on July 12, 2013, 11:12:46 PM
Quote from: batt on July 12, 2013, 10:31:04 PM
Quote from: batt on July 12, 2013, 07:47:23 PM
I feel Danger going huge tonight but don't have the guts to take the VC off Pendles.
Switched to Danger 10 seconds before lockout.

>:(
Why or why batt. Didn't we convince you? I'm glad I left t VC on Pendles and even more stoked that Danger's score was low as my opp has him!! Gonna get him 2-3 weeks time  ;)
As you can see, I have a knack for screwing up ahaha.

Oh well, time for Gaz to pull a 170.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions