Dream Team Vs Super Coach

[nrich102]

So what game is better and why?

I'm a Dream Teamer myself, Supercoach Scoring makes no sense.

[BB67th]

SuperCoach by far, while you don't know how many points each play is going to get you, it is weighted so players with an actual influence on the game get points. Also, I'm far better at it so it has to be better :P

[Capper]

SuperCoach by far, while you don't know how many points each play is going to get you, it is weighted so players with an actual influence on the game get points. Also, I'm far better at it so it has to be better :P

agree

[Vinny]

Supercoach for me ! :)

It is more about how players use the ball and if they use it well rather than just racking up touches.

But in saying that I have no DT experience.

[My Chumps]

Two trades a week is stupid as hell and takes out so much strategy in the game. Makes it easier for scrubs. SC > DT.

[Holz]

the SC scoring system is a joke they just make it up each week.

the 2 trades a week is even worse.

SC is less bad.

normally DT all the way but SC this year.

[nrich102]

I like 2 trades a week more than rolling lockout

[specky92]

If a player gets 20 disposals which are all immediate turnover what is the score difference, just interested, do DT deduct points for that?  ???

[nrich102]

No, they don't

[kilbluff1985]

So what game is better and why?

I'm a Dream Teamer myself, Supercoach Scoring makes no sense.

SC scoring system not that hard to figure out

more influence on the game a player has the higher they will score obviously getting possessions but how they use it to efficiency is very important

if it's a pretty close game last quater is the most important any game defining plays etc are scored highly winning goal can get a player 50 points etc

[elephants]

I think both have their good things and bad things. Its all down to personal preference.

People with no experience in one game or the other will also just pick the game they actually play.

I have played DT for 5 years now and love the simplicity and ease of the scoring. Am going to give SC a crack next year, only then will I be able to make a reasonable judgement.

What I'm trying to say though is there really isn't one right answer here haha :P

[Holz]

So what game is better and why?

I'm a Dream Teamer myself, Supercoach Scoring makes no sense.

SC scoring system not that hard to figure out

more influence on the game a player has the higher they will score obviously getting possessions but how they use it to efficiency is very important

if it's a pretty close game last quater is the most important any game defining plays etc are scored highly winning goal can get a player 50 points etc

thats in theory there are too many cases where I watch players rack up SC points for nothing and others for getting robbed. the fact they need to scale for 3300 is a joke too.

why should a hawks v sydney clash get the same ammount of points as dogs v deemons. Its the reason why griffen has been killing it.

the best scoring system would be a combo of the 2.

so you get standardised points but you take into account effeicny.

so effective kick 4 points
ineffective kick 2 points etc....

[kilbluff1985]

yeah that sounds good Holz kinda like sportal?

[Justin Bieber]

Yeah DT is shower this year. I use to be a DTer, but I'm on the SC bandwagon now babeyyy.

[Holz]

yeah that sounds good Holz kinda like sportal?

yeah sportal is better but its too small.

basically DT scoring with SC rules would be perfect for me.

I like the rolling lockout to counter the green vest and 30 trades is good. 24 is preferable but 30 is still better.

I want the option to choose to trade or not.