Main Menu

Number 1 pick for Buddy

Started by Hawka, July 02, 2013, 11:54:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

nostradamus

l think they should go after Naitanui instead of Buddy

Ziplock

Quote from: nostradamus on July 02, 2013, 11:36:29 PM
l think they should go after Naitanui instead of Buddy

that would be my thought as well. Nic nat isn't a free agent though, so we'd have to secure a trade for him- and it would have to be a ridiculous one as well considering the shelf life of cox atm.

It'd be something like our first and second round picks + one of our first round picks from the 2011/2012 draft.

elephants

For Nic Nat?

Coniglio, Shiel, Giles, Ward and all your picks in the upcoming draft.

Thanks ;)

Ziplock

Well, you guys traded a brownlow medalist for kennedy (pick 4 2005), pick 3 and an upgrade from pick 46 to pick 20

So really what I put on the table was better than that.

Or we could wait until he's out of contract next year and get him for nothing in the pre season draft :P

elephants

I maintain we murdered that Judd trade :P

And Nic Nat will sign, don't you worry ;)

Ziplock

#moneytalks

nic nat would be a better fit anyway, we need another ruckman who can go forward- giles can, but then we depend on someone like tomlinson to ruck :'(

elephants

#moneymaytalkforsome #notforNic #loyalty

Couldn't agree more he'd be a better ickup than Buddy. He'd arguably be more marketable too!

AFEV

Being from WA (and a WC supporter I think?) - Good luck getting Nic to leave for the shower side of Sydney. :P

Ziplock

well he's actually from western sydney...

albeit moved to the shower side of australia when he was like 1 :P

the giants actually live at breakfast point, which is a really nice part of sydney :P

kilbluff1985

yeah have heard the complex they live in is really good surprised there has not been much video footage of it

elephants

The 'shower side of Australia' is still better than Western Sydney ;) And yes he does support WCE :D

And I'm fairly sure he was younger than 1 when he moved to the West ;)

nrich102

Quote from: Sid on July 02, 2013, 08:22:00 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on July 02, 2013, 05:32:12 PM
GWS doesn't need Buddy
Yes they do. They are haemorrhaging money and he is the most marketable player in the game.
But they have Patton and Cameron already!

kilbluff1985

been talk of Patton playing as a defender think he did when was younger or something

Capper

GWS doesnt have to give Hawthorn anything for Buddy. If he leaves the Hawks might get pick 20 as a compo pick but that is all.

Looks like Tom Boyd will go at Number 1 so what ever team needs a full forward for the future will go after pick one, but believe me GWS wont give up pick 1 for a no body

SydneyRox

Quote from: tabs on July 03, 2013, 02:53:06 PM
GWS doesnt have to give Hawthorn anything for Buddy. If he leaves the Hawks might get pick 20 as a compo pick but that is all.

Looks like Tom Boyd will go at Number 1 so what ever team needs a full forward for the future will go after pick one, but believe me GWS wont give up pick 1 for a no body

How bout Jesse White??  8)