Tom Mitchell

Started by bigdaddyg, June 08, 2013, 05:59:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

A lock or not

Yes
60 (87%)
No
9 (13%)

Total Members Voted: 4

disco1992

#15
Did muston have a break even of - 130 odd?
I know he started big but Mitchell has the highest average in the afl!! Better than gaz

bigdaddyg

#16
Lock him in Eddie

stew42

Holy motherflower!!! Left for 20 mins, come back to see Mitchy at 140!

I am hyperventilating at this guy. Flower I love him.

Possumo

Quote from: stew42 on June 08, 2013, 07:17:47 PM
Holy motherflower!!! Left for 20 mins, come back to see Mitchy at 140!

I am hyperventilating at this guy. Flower I love him.

Those that brought him in early will be rewarded with a fair jump in the overall you would reckon... kicking myself I wasn't part of that 10% that did (especially considering my trade in was Robbo instead!).

Flame

I brought him in but then again so did my eliminator opponent! :'(

powersuperkents

Quote from: stew42 on June 08, 2013, 06:13:25 PM
Pointless thread. It's like saying "Is Ablett a possible captain choice this week?"
+1

Is this even a question? 98 in a first game is good enough... 144 by any player is amazing!!!!!!!

I'll be going Kommer-> Hrovat next week
then Crouch-> T Mitch the week after so my midfield will be any to field 4 players (Swallow, Cotchin, Hrovat & Tom Mitchell) + Hutchings (who I might have enough money from 3 downgrade to turn into Kane Cornes, Jack or Richard Douglas (started him as my last pick in my fantasy elite draft.. Turns out to be my best pick of all (my first pick "Beams" has turned out to be my worst (complete reversal)

He is a godsend ;D

Adamant

After lockout ended on Monday, my first trades were Lonergan --> NRoo and Moloney --> Mitchell/K.Martin.

I already had 450k in the bank, but still wanted to downgrade to one of them to continually upgrade through the byes. Then the Stanton hype started and I ended up splashing my cash and brought him in instead.

To think I could've brought in Mitchell and had an extra 130k in the bank, as well as a massive 144 (rather than Stants' pathetic 52).

::)

powersuperkents

Quote from: Adamant on June 08, 2013, 07:41:53 PM
After lockout ended on Monday, my first trades were Lonergan --> NRoo and Moloney --> Mitchell/K.Martin.

I already had 450k in the bank, but still wanted to downgrade to one of them to continually upgrade through the byes. Then the Stanton hype started and I ended up splashing my cash and brought him in instead.

To think I could've brought in Mitchell and had an extra 130k in the bank, as well as a massive 144 (rather than Stants' pathetic 52).

::)
Stants is a d**k. I'm still holding though, I think if I trade him out I'll regret it for the rest of the season  :-\

m_zulian

i voted no because I already have him in my team. You should already have him

powersuperkents

Quote from: m_zulian on June 08, 2013, 07:45:11 PM
i voted no because I already have him in my team. You should already have him
Why would we get a player before he's on the bubble...

its me lads


stew42

Quote from: Possumo on June 08, 2013, 07:34:14 PM
Quote from: stew42 on June 08, 2013, 07:17:47 PM
Holy motherflower!!! Left for 20 mins, come back to see Mitchy at 140!

I am hyperventilating at this guy. Flower I love him.

Those that brought him in early will be rewarded with a fair jump in the overall you would reckon... kicking myself I wasn't part of that 10% that did (especially considering my trade in was Robbo instead!).
I'm kicking myself even more, I brought in Stanton  ::)

Sweetness

Should have got him instead of Stanton.... that's a lazy 92 points I'll never get back...

pommyadam

went for Stanton and Mitchell over Kruezer and Nicholls

still not sure if i made the right choice yet :-\
it'll be close though

Sweetness

Quote from: pommyadam on June 08, 2013, 08:02:46 PM
went for Stanton and Mitchell over Kruezer and Nicholls

still not sure if i made the right choice yet :-\
it'll be close though

Yeah that will be pretty close I reckon