Best 18 scoring all the time?

[TheMoops]

I know it would never happen, but I actually reckon it would be a great idea! I know part of SC is picking players who don't score low obviously, but sometimes it's out of your control. For example, I was stopped from getting reasonable overall scores the last few weeks because of Jesse Lonergan getting injured and scoring a 20 two weeks ago, and Matt Jones getting subbed out last week for not much more.

I just think it would be a cool system as it would ease the pain of things like that. I also reckon it would make teams less generic and have more PODs as people wouldn't be deterred from picking them as much! Anyone else agree?

[Vinny]

Interesting idea mate ! But I reckon the fact that 22 must be fielded gives more challenge for coaches to do well, hence earn their ranking. SC also involves quite a fair bit of luck and sometimes you just are unlucky ! Especially higher up in the rankings.

[Redbaron]

Not a bad idea but the challenge is to get the best players in your team, maybe if they took your best 22 scores from field players and emergencies.

[TheMoops]

Yeah I know what you're saying, and although I agree it would undeniably take away some of the challenge they said that about increasing our yearly trades to 30 but now we all love it!