Main Menu

It's happened again!

Started by PowerBug, June 02, 2013, 12:22:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PowerBug

PaddyCakes had a goal overturned yesterday coz of the review. Crows supporters shut up it didn't cost you the match, he kicked the next goal anyway. But the way the umps went about the decision again is questionable. Goal umpire says 100% goal, boundary ump says 100% point, this should go upstairs and if/when inconclusive it should come back a goal, as that's what the goal ump said.

I say it hit the post, but that is irrelevant coz the process is what needs addressing.
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

specky92

I didn't see it but this has happened before. For some reason Umpires call is the boundary umpire? Their called a goal umpire for a reason, we should go with their decision unless its a dispute between a point and an out of bounds on the full.

tbagrocks

I disagree on it not costing us the match, because Paddy should have been in the guts which cost us the match :o

But yeah what? That took way too long! Not good enough!

Spinking

Yep I agree. It probably hit the post, but the process didn't work.

My understanding was that the review was brought in to overturn clearly incorrect decisions. Howlers that can quickly be put right just by having a look at the video.

I'm in favour of the original decision standing when the video is inconclusive, which I assumed was what was supposed to happen, and clearly didn't last night. In my opinion it should have been given a goal in line with the goal umpire's original call.

What was also odd was that the boundary umpire said he'd "heard" it hit the post...  :o

Bill Manspeaker

what's the use of having it if it always comes back as "inconclusive"

the ball hit the post 100%, also in the Suns vs Cats game. the guy (can't remember who) pushed it through for a point, and it comes back as "inconclusive".

who the flower sits up there making the decision? if he gets a pay check each week then it's a disgrace. he doesn't actually DO anything.

fix it up for flowers sake

Ziplock

anyone got footage? the video on the afl website was

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2013-06-01/danger-danger

which obviously were the goals he didn't miss.

Pretty sure the second one he should have been pinged for in the back, but w.e

specky92

Kicking in danger never gets called anymore!  >:(

tbagrocks

Quote from: specky92 on June 02, 2013, 12:52:12 PM
Kicking in danger never gets called anymore!  >:(
Like Lairdy's ball to the face!

specky92

Quote from: tbagrocks on June 02, 2013, 12:55:41 PM
Quote from: specky92 on June 02, 2013, 12:52:12 PM
Kicking in danger never gets called anymore!  >:(
Like Lairdy's ball to the face!
I didn't see it but it discourages players to pick the ball up amongst a pack cause they don't want broken fingers

Toga

Geez, Freo gets on the end of some dodgy calls, hey? :P

But yeah I agree it didn't cost the Crows the match but the system is flawed... The footage is always so poor, it's just automatically gotta be "inconclusive". Get some more high-res cameras up, or forget about it IMO.



Quote from: tbagrocks on June 02, 2013, 12:55:41 PM
Quote from: specky92 on June 02, 2013, 12:52:12 PM
Kicking in danger never gets called anymore!  >:(
Like Lairdy's ball to the face!

That wasn't in danger! He just went to lay a good smother and accidentally copped it in the face! :P

tbagrocks

That's my boy! His face stopped the goal! :o

How good is this boy! Good enough to stop the crows from needing to draft Sammy Col ;)

Ziplock

Quote from: Toga on June 02, 2013, 01:26:49 PM
Geez, Freo gets on the end of some dodgy calls, hey? :P

But yeah I agree it didn't cost the Crows the match but the system is flawed... The footage is always so poor, it's just automatically gotta be "inconclusive". Get some more high-res cameras up, or forget about it IMO.



Quote from: tbagrocks on June 02, 2013, 12:55:41 PM
Quote from: specky92 on June 02, 2013, 12:52:12 PM
Kicking in danger never gets called anymore!  >:(
Like Lairdy's ball to the face!

That wasn't in danger! He just went to lay a good smother and accidentally copped it in the face! :P

yeah, unfortunately, I agree. They need to up the quality and number of cameras- cant see shower with the way it is now.

Tominator

Quote from: Toga on June 02, 2013, 01:26:49 PM
Geez, Freo gets on the end of some dodgy calls, hey? :P

But yeah I agree it didn't cost the Crows the match but the system is flawed... The footage is always so poor, it's just automatically gotta be "inconclusive". Get some more high-res cameras up, or forget about it IMO.

ATTENTION Andrew Demetriou !!