Main Menu

Flag and farewell?

Started by Nige, May 22, 2013, 08:16:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: TheAnt on May 23, 2013, 09:20:09 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on May 23, 2013, 06:11:48 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on May 22, 2013, 11:09:50 PM
So basically,  Cotch will still be keading the tiges through the banner at 73? :P
What I would have said!

However .........  Trent sucks so won't be on the list for too many years more anyway ;)

Didn't Tambling say the same thing :o
Dangerfield has had a worse year then Cotchin so..

Dangers had two good games out of 8 :P

tbagrocks

Quote from: TheAnt on May 23, 2013, 09:20:09 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on May 23, 2013, 06:11:48 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on May 22, 2013, 11:09:50 PM
So basically,  Cotch will still be keading the tiges through the banner at 73? :P
What I would have said!

However .........  Trent sucks so won't be on the list for too many years more anyway ;)

Didn't Tambling say the same thing :o
Dangerfield has had a worse year then Cotchin so..
Don't be stupid, oops, too late ::)

FWI: The Victorian bias is what led me to the Danger march! Ironic! It was March I had people believing Danger was better :o

Well those people did better, Danger is the man to be on!

Ziplock

once again, I live in NSW and have no victorian bias, and didnt rate either of them in dt. In sc I rated cotchin higher due to an extra season of 100+ average.

In DT- dangerfield was never a true mid premium, and has dropped 5 points off his average
cotchin- dropped 13 points off his average

sc- danger dropped 10 points off his average
cotchin- increased his average by 10 points

so basically- both bad picks in dt (albeit, cotchin worse since he's dropped more)
in sc: cotchin was easily the best pick.

so... it wasn't bias, just good analysis... dangerfield was a shower pick to start with in both comps :S

elephants

Hahaha this argument is ridiculous.

Bill Manspeaker

Quote from: elephants on May 24, 2013, 01:11:50 AM
Hahaha this argument is ridiculous.

it really is. i don't mind reading it though ;D

elephants

Quote from: brad on May 24, 2013, 02:02:34 AM
Quote from: elephants on May 24, 2013, 01:11:50 AM
Hahaha this argument is ridiculous.

it really is. i don't mind reading it though ;D

yeah haha, by all means keep going guys :P

ossie85


Yep, keep arguing guys.

How about the loser gets to play for Collingwood next year?

T Dog

Quote from: ossie85 on May 24, 2013, 08:59:48 AM

Yep, keep arguing guys.

How about the loser gets to play for Collingwood next year?

Nice Oz...Cotchin , Dangerfield and of course Buddy in....Daisy out...works for me... ;D

Toga

Nah keep going tbag & co, we love the Tiger hate!

#MeansYouAreWorried

;)

quinny88

Silver lining.. Cochin retiring would mean we won the flag  ;D
If we won the flag we will have had a bloody good side and season and will be ok without him. Premiership sides don't win them on the back of one good player.

Not that it matters he won't retire anyway. Who would when youre in the prime of your career and a chance to go back to back

Toga

Lol apparently now GWS is targeting Jroo because Bud is too expensive. Good luck. ::)

Nige

Lulz, I saw that too.

I didn't even finish reading it before I started laughing.

Toga

Haha good luck to Sheeds I say.

Don't think there's a bloke at the Richmond Footy Club that bleeds Yellow & Black like Jack.

Nige

Won't even be Sheeds will it, Leon Cameron's the man in charge come the end of the season isn't he? Dunno who their recruitment guy or list manager or whoever is...

But yeah, Jack's not going on. Good luck Giants.  :P

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: Toga on May 24, 2013, 01:12:51 PM
Haha good luck to Sheeds I say.

Don't think there's a bloke at the Richmond Footy Club that bleeds Yellow & Black like Jack.

Only person Jack bleeds for is himself :P