Nic Nat new BE?

[kilbluff1985]

Anybody know what his new BE will be?

[roo boys!]

According to m0nty, 120.

[Jay]

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/game/newprices.php?id=4464

[quinny88]

According to m0nty, 120.

Think it will be less than that unfortunately. His projected score was 101 which was going to give him a b/e of 132 but of course he had to come out with a monster score  ::)

[woofy]

With Dwyer scoring well I can afford to wait on NN untill later on now.

[kilbluff1985]

thanks guys don't know who to bring in Buddy or Nic Nat

Buddy so tempting at his price Nic Nat more consistent

[jeesh]

Should be a very gettable break even seeing they play GWS next. Think I might go Daisy -> Nic Nat

[roo boys!]

According to m0nty, 120.

Think it will be less than that unfortunately. His projected score was 101 which was going to give him a b/e of 132 but of course he had to come out with a monster score  ::)

Nah that's going off the link that Jayman posted, updated after the games.

I'm very angry about that mark+goal to NicNat, it lost my beloved North a game that we really should have won and also it most likely flowered my plan to go Macaffer+Neade to Buddy and NicNat >:(

[quinny88]

According to m0nty, 120.

Think it will be less than that unfortunately. His projected score was 101 which was going to give him a b/e of 132 but of course he had to come out with a monster score  ::)

Nah that's going off the link that Jayman posted, updated after the games.

I'm very angry about that mark+goal to NicNat, it lost my beloved North a game that we really should have won and also it most likely flowered my plan to go Macaffer+Neade to Buddy and NicNat >:(

Yeah I know but those b/e's are often wrong. We will find out tonight anyway I guess. I hope your right coz I can justify holding off another week if he's got a b/e of 120

[roo boys!]

According to m0nty, 120.

Think it will be less than that unfortunately. His projected score was 101 which was going to give him a b/e of 132 but of course he had to come out with a monster score  ::)

Nah that's going off the link that Jayman posted, updated after the games.

I'm very angry about that mark+goal to NicNat, it lost my beloved North a game that we really should have won and also it most likely flowered my plan to go Macaffer+Neade to Buddy and NicNat >:(

Yeah I know but those b/e's are often wrong. We will find out tonight anyway I guess. I hope your right coz I can justify holding off another week if he's got a b/e of 120

Yep I reckon I'll give Macaffer another week

[Footyrulz]

new BE is 100, but then should drop another 40k in a few weeks if he doesn post another massive score.

http://tooserious.net/PlayerSalaryCalculator.aspx?id=705&name=Nic%20Naitanui

[hannebery2rohan]

new BE is 100, but then should drop another 40k in a few weeks if he doesn post another massive score.

http://tooserious.net/PlayerSalaryCalculator.aspx?id=705&name=Nic%20Naitanui

Can't see him dropping another 40k on top of the 35k he'll drop this week. The 40 he had in his first game back is out of his rolling average now. Think he'llhold at his current price.

[Mat0369]

They are playing GWS, there is a good chance he hits his B/E if it was 160. I think we might have a few players to be worried about getting rested by the Eagles

[kilbluff1985]

They are playing GWS, there is a good chance he hits his B/E if it was 160. I think we might have a few players to be worried about getting rested by the Eagles

not really think they need a guaranteed win and to find some nice form

Cox might get dropped though but there bye not to far away so i don't see to many restings happening

[doogz]

IF woosh is smart he should rest cox and put sinclair in.  Cox has pretty much shouldered the whole workload of the ruck the first 6 weeks.  Plus it is a massive trip over east. 

Need more fitness in nat so he needs to play.