help

[pommyadam]

i should've started with either of those  (McEvoy or Minson) ahead of spuds like Ryder

maddening

[Alka]

Mike Pyke has gone 55, 63, 84... at this rate he'll be hitting the ton this week and beyond!
It's simple maths. Lock and load.

[powersuperkents]

i should've started with either of those  (McEvoy or Minson) ahead of spuds like Ryder

maddening

I started McEvoy and I'm loving him, pumps out consistent scores each week. I originally picked him in my starting 2011 team by fluke and he broke out averaging in the high 80's same thing with Fyfe that year as well :)

I want to bring Minson into my side later and put Cox in the forwards

[Adamant]

i should've started with either of those  (McEvoy or Minson) ahead of spuds like Ryder

maddening

I started McEvoy and I'm loving him, pumps out consistent scores each week. I originally picked him in my starting 2011 team by fluke and he broke out averaging in the high 80's same thing with Fyfe that year as well :)

I want to bring Minson into my side later and put Cox in the forwards

Hmm, Minson's only averaging a solid 83. Not amazing.

Everyone should aim to have Cox finish in their rucks, since forwards score a lot more than ruckmen. Wouldn't you rather a top 6 forward than Minson?

[powersuperkents]

i should've started with either of those  (McEvoy or Minson) ahead of spuds like Ryder

maddening

I started McEvoy and I'm loving him, pumps out consistent scores each week. I originally picked him in my starting 2011 team by fluke and he broke out averaging in the high 80's same thing with Fyfe that year as well :)

I want to bring Minson into my side later and put Cox in the forwards

Hmm, Minson's only averaging a solid 83. Not amazing.

Everyone should aim to have Cox finish in their rucks, since forwards score a lot more than ruckmen. Wouldn't you rather a top 6 forward than Minson?

That's fair. Considering that I will probably just do that :) I'm already lucky enough to have Ben Mc :)