Gary Ablett MRI Scans on Hand

[McRooster]

MRI scan actually revealed he had this in his hand already...

[powersuperkents]

GAJ doesn't need limbs to get 120+ a game.  :P

That's why he scored 120 the last two weeks...or 110...


Injured or not, he won't average 115. If injured, which I hope he isn't btw I'm not a sicko who wishes injury upon players, might not even pass 110.

If I'm right, it will be the greatest I told you so of all time. OF ALL TIME.

What are you ranked Jukes?

The funny thing is that he picked spud players like Kieran Harper so don't even listen to his stupid advice hahaha

hahahaha Jukes did you pick Gaj this year. I bet you selected your team, tried to get Ablett but couldn't find room without dumping any of your spud picks and then convinced yourself to believe Dangerfield would score more and you were so jealous because everyone else had Ablett and you wanted him you coined the name "Spudlett". Admit it if you could get him you'd want him, otherwise he's in your team right now

No, he picked his team and chose Stanton over Ablett. What a stupid question to ask....

Glad i listened to Jukes in not getting him, would be a pain and a waste of $$$ for those with. ANd tbh, Even Swan has started slowly by our standards, better value elsewhere.

I'm sorry but Stanton>Ablett is the dumbest choice I've ever heard. No one beats Swan or Gaj, they are kingpins and by the end of the season are must haves. Stants will only average 100-110 whilst Ablett should get 115-125. I brought in Watson over Stants last week and although he didn't score as much I still think I made the right decision because Watson will average 5-10 points more by the end of the season as well. Stants is a pain... Always starts off incredibly every single season and then just turns into pure crap.

[powersuperkents]

MRI scan actually revealed he had this in his hand already...

hahaahahahaha too true. Unless Swan, Pendles, Cotchin or Watson steal it away from him this year ;)

[PowerBug]

GAJ doesn't need limbs to get 120+ a game.  :P

That's why he scored 120 the last two weeks...or 110...


Injured or not, he won't average 115. If injured, which I hope he isn't btw I'm not a sicko who wishes injury upon players, might not even pass 110.

If I'm right, it will be the greatest I told you so of all time. OF ALL TIME.

What are you ranked Jukes?

The funny thing is that he picked spud players like Kieran Harper so don't even listen to his stupid advice hahaha

hahahaha Jukes did you pick Gaj this year. I bet you selected your team, tried to get Ablett but couldn't find room without dumping any of your spud picks and then convinced yourself to believe Dangerfield would score more and you were so jealous because everyone else had Ablett and you wanted him you coined the name "Spudlett". Admit it if you could get him you'd want him, otherwise he's in your team right now

No, he picked his team and chose Stanton over Ablett. What a stupid question to ask....

Glad i listened to Jukes in not getting him, would be a pain and a waste of $$$ for those with. ANd tbh, Even Swan has started slowly by our standards, better value elsewhere.

I'm sorry but Stanton>Ablett is the dumbest choice I've ever heard. No one beats Swan or Gaj, they are kingpins and by the end of the season are must haves. Stants will only average 100-110 whilst Ablett should get 115-125. I brought in Watson over Stants last week and although he didn't score as much I still think I made the right decision because Watson will average 5-10 points more by the end of the season as well. Stants is a pain... Always starts off incredibly every single season and then just turns into pure crap.

ok. :) but Jukes has made the better decision so far, you can't deny that. And who knows, this might be Stanton's year. :)

[Jukes]

I will give everybody in this thread $20 if Ablett is averaging more than Stants come bye rounds.

[Andrew]

I will give everybody in this thread $20 if Ablett is averaging more than Stants come bye rounds.

I'm getting in this thread just in case!! :P

But seriously, news here first on this possible hand injury. I was planning on bringing in Ablett next week, this throws a major spanner in the works.

[RookieDTer]

I will give everybody in this thread $20 if Ablett is averaging more than Stants come bye rounds.

Brilliant! I just lost $20 on the Showdown!

[Justin Bieber]

Gary's won a brownlow. But is a spud? Stanton sucks and is a god?

[Windigo]

I will give everybody in this thread $20 if Ablett is averaging more than Stants come bye rounds.

I accept cash, cheque, credit, paypal, western union, bank transfer, or mastercard.

- Thanks.

[Jay]

Gary's won a brownlow. But is a spud? Stanton sucks and is a god?

lol too true ::) #jukeslogic

Getting in this thread to collect my $20

[Windigo]

Stanton has tonned up in has last 3 against Saints.  ;D

[Ricochet]

Any actual news on Ablett's hand?

[Jay]

Tbh I am with Jukes on Stanton being a good pick. Was always going to find it easier with Goddard at the club and Dyson going through the midfield - wont get the attention he got in the 2nd half of last year.

BUT

To say that Ablett is a bad pick or Stanton is a better pick than Ablett I don't agree with. GAJ is a superstar and will pump out premium numbers all season long, even with a flowered up hand. Whenever I have doubted him it has come back to bite me.

[Toga]

Any actual news on Ablett's hand?

Can't find anything at all Ric :(



And yeah, I agree Stants was a good pick I just wish I had stuck with my gut and gone with him... :( But not complaining with Ablett instead so far.. :P

[turry17]

Agree Stanton would have been a good pick, unfortunelty went with Jelwood instead. But Ablett will still be a top 8 mud even if his average drops a little so your gonna want him in there eventually. Plus 2 rounds ago he did bust out a 130+