SIPOSS VS KARNY

Started by The F.A.R.K., April 15, 2013, 03:41:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

I can only trade one which one do you TRADE this week

Karny
15 (68.2%)
Siposs
7 (31.8%)

Total Members Voted: 2

The F.A.R.K.


Cicjose

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

Ricochet

Siposs was actually looking the goods with an 80 in round 1. He just can't escape that bloody vest.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

The F.A.R.K.

Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)


powersuperkents

#5
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

elephants

Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

Bad call, many kept him as he was not going to leak in value while many others were. Benching him wasn't an all bad plan.

Cicjose

technically they both shouldn't have been in any teams

powersuperkents

Cicjose I agree fully with you on Siposs. If we could have foreseen Karny I would also agree. But at the time Karny looked as if he'd average 80 and gain showerloads of cash, In the end if you avoided him you were lucky ;)

Adamant

I was never interested in Karny, always thought he was fools gold. Nobody listened to me. :P

The F.A.R.K.

Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower

Andrew

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 16, 2013, 02:09:12 AM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower


"powersuperkents" rants on so many threads, long-winded and often attacking another poster. It does make this forum a bit shower as I don't come on here to read lectures and barrages of abuse. I guess the Cheer/Boo ratio speaks for itself...

Ricochet

Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned
Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Ricochet on April 16, 2013, 11:29:10 AM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned
Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.
haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will 

powersuperkents

Quote from: Andrew on April 16, 2013, 02:15:11 AM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 16, 2013, 02:09:12 AM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on April 15, 2013, 09:12:35 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on April 15, 2013, 06:47:22 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on April 15, 2013, 03:44:03 PM
why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out
hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower


"powersuperkents" rants on so many threads, long-winded and often attacking another poster. It does make this forum a bit shower as I don't come on here to read lectures and barrages of abuse. I guess the Cheer/Boo ratio speaks for itself...
Look at the FARKS...