Help Colli Please - read then vote - cheers

[Colliwobblers]

MY MIDS:  SWAN - ABLETT - BEAMS - PENDLES - DANGERFIELD - Wines - Viney - O'Meara  (K Mithell - M Jones )

OK so pretty set on trading DANGERFIELD   to  WATSON.

danger to be tagged by raines this week how can it be any better than last week?

so poll is for BEAMS  to   WHO ?

there is an option on the poll for KEEP DANGERFIELD and trade BEAMS to WATSON.

IF YOU VOTE THIS OPTION IT MEANS YOU BACK DANGERFIELD TO OUTSCORE EVERYONE ELSE IN THE POLL THIS ROUND.

Please think 2013 when voting - no need to hold trades and not sideways trade premiums. no need at all. 2 every week.

[Noz]

Beams to Watson and keep Danger?

[nostradamus]

l agree with trading Danger to Watson.......l did it before rnd 1  ;)

so my vote went for getting in Moloney for Beams and spending the cash left elsewhere

[nightwalker_1310au]

Sideline beams. You got him for reason mate. Max score this week beam might score would be 120 tops and rookie on bench you might get coverage and they score 75-80 you loose ground of only 40 points. Why waste a Trade. Should keep him mate that's what I'm doing as for him for reason.

[grimreaper]

I'm giving Dangerfield another week, if not hes Watson next week.. But, if you can't help yourself.. To watson  8)

[Colliwobblers]

Sideline beams. You got him for reason mate. Max score this week beam might score would be 120 tops and rookie on bench you might get coverage and they score 75-80 you loose ground of only 40 points. Why waste a Trade. Should keep him mate that's what I'm doing as for him for reason.

Beams is listed as 1-2 weeks , we have two trades every week, i would just trade him straight back in when he plays his first or maybe second game.

2 trades we get every week, we use them or they are gone, so it is nothing to trade him out and then back in again this season.

i would have agreed 100% with you in every previous season, but why lose that 40 points minimum you mention for a week or maybe two when the trades are there to use - or lose ?

[Toga]

Sideline beams. You got him for reason mate. Max score this week beam might score would be 120 tops and rookie on bench you might get coverage and they score 75-80 you loose ground of only 40 points. Why waste a Trade. Should keep him mate that's what I'm doing as for him for reason.

Not wasting a trade if it's gonna disappear if you don't use it... :o

I think Watson should definitely be high on your list of priorities, he had a mammoth score last week playing up forwards for a lot of it! :o

[lolamusi]

With 2 trades a weekwhy not dang to mollo and beans to selwood 8)

[Colliwobblers]

With 2 trades a weekwhy not dang to mollo and beans to selwood 8)

good call, means you like selwood better than Watson?

[MTTY]

I seriously recommend Barlow. Feel he could get back to pre-Palmer days and is my tip for the Brownlow. So glad i started with him. The fact that Fyfe is playing mainly midfield and copping a tag is all the more beneficial.

[Sapientia]

Went with Fyfe. Cracker of a player and will gain cash. Best of both worlds.

[Toga]

With 2 trades a weekwhy not dang to mollo and beans to selwood 8)

good call, means you like selwood better than Watson?

Yeah I like that one as well, but with Watson instead of Selly ;)

[slipknot_4]

Ryan Griffen anyone???

[Colliwobblers]

Ryan Griffen anyone???

was tempted to add him but those kids around him, and cooney, are stepping it up and boyd still to come back in, not sure griffen can be a top 8 mid?

not sure he can't either. but not keen on having any more uncertainties in my side after round ones effort.

[Bones Bombers]

Guess I have to say Cotch since that's my exact midfield 8)