CHAMPIONS LEAGUE GROUP STAGES

Started by Holz, April 03, 2013, 12:38:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ossie85


Holz

Quote from: ossie85 on May 15, 2013, 11:14:12 AM

Worlds domination!

maybee its because the euro is a more even comp ossie ;)

Ziplock

which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

Holz

Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

ossie85

Quote from: Holzman on May 15, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

lol, SC inferior? DT is simpler, but simpler is not superior. SC at least attempts to measure reality (you can argue on how well it does it), DT doesn't care about reality.

But, the reason for the disparity was because of some very poor trading by some coaches.

Ziplock

this is what I'm confused about, like you have strong blocking systems... how come shower trades weren't blocked?

ossie85

Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 06:51:46 PM
this is what I'm confused about, like you have strong blocking systems... how come shower trades weren't blocked?

Cos people were too nice or didn't care or were afraid that people would block there trades :(

nostradamus

Quote from: ossie85 on May 15, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 15, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

lol, SC inferior? DT is simpler, but simpler is not superior. SC at least attempts to measure reality (you can argue on how well it does it), DT doesn't care about reality.

But, the reason for the disparity was because of some very poor trading by some coaches.

The equalisation factor (1.03) should have been based on only the teams in the Champions League instead of across the whole league........this is the reason for the disparity in scoring

Nails

Pretty sure it was already adjusted to be like that just before the start of the comp Nostra

nostradamus

Quote from: Nails on May 15, 2013, 10:13:19 PM
Pretty sure it was already adjusted to be like that just before the start of the comp Nostra

Cheers Nails, l must have got it wrong. l thought it was based on the whole leagues

Holz

Quote from: nostradamus on May 15, 2013, 09:43:13 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 15, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 15, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

lol, SC inferior? DT is simpler, but simpler is not superior. SC at least attempts to measure reality (you can argue on how well it does it), DT doesn't care about reality.

But, the reason for the disparity was because of some very poor trading by some coaches.

The equalisation factor (1.03) should have been based on only the teams in the Champions League instead of across the whole league........this is the reason for the disparity in scoring

That is one way too look at it, I really think its more to do with the fact that teams changed soo much over the trading, which wont be the case next year.

If you remove the titans and put the eagles into the comp than we would probably have 2 of the top 4/5 spots.

ossie85

Quote from: nostradamus on May 15, 2013, 09:43:13 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 15, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 15, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

lol, SC inferior? DT is simpler, but simpler is not superior. SC at least attempts to measure reality (you can argue on how well it does it), DT doesn't care about reality.

But, the reason for the disparity was because of some very poor trading by some coaches.

The equalisation factor (1.03) should have been based on only the teams in the Champions League instead of across the whole league........this is the reason for the disparity in scoring

Very much disagree! That punishes teams for doing extremely well.

Holz

Quote from: ossie85 on May 16, 2013, 07:56:06 AM
Quote from: nostradamus on May 15, 2013, 09:43:13 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on May 15, 2013, 06:36:09 PM
Quote from: Holzman on May 15, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 15, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
which is a bit odd considering worlds is significantly more structured/ rigid than euros.

how have you ended up with such team disparity is beyond me :P

it is abit strange considering they block trades and I have never blockeda trade beofre (will next year). I think its because SC is the inferior scoring system and its very uneven compared to DT. Also the fact euro has only 14 teams its means most have quality players and the depth is quite strong.

lol, SC inferior? DT is simpler, but simpler is not superior. SC at least attempts to measure reality (you can argue on how well it does it), DT doesn't care about reality.

But, the reason for the disparity was because of some very poor trading by some coaches.

The equalisation factor (1.03) should have been based on only the teams in the Champions League instead of across the whole league........this is the reason for the disparity in scoring

Very much disagree! That punishes teams for doing extremely well.

It based across the whole league. If it wasnt i think it would be 5-6% not 3%

Nails

Holz wasn't it originally based off the whole league

but then you noticed like every team from one of the competitions won

Then you rejigged it to be only those team in the top 8 that affected the adjustment?

Holz

Quote from: Nails on May 16, 2013, 10:41:03 AM
Holz wasn't it originally based off the whole league

but then you noticed like every team from one of the competitions won

Then you rejigged it to be only those team in the top 8 that affected the adjustment?

no they still are for the whole leagues. The euro did compete 4 from both comp made it through but the worlds top 4 is hard to crack. they will probably win but the metal eagles roulettes can compete with the 3% handicap.