Missing Forum Member!!!

[Jukes]

lol

What were you guys saying?

[Nige]

lol

What were you guys saying?

*crickets chirp*

I kid...

Jukes' call was about averaging less than 116 this season.

It's Round 2 and we're already calling people right, wrong, genius and spud.

We won't know his average until the end of the season at which point we'll find out who in fact was correct.

Bump this thread on September 2nd.

[Jay]

Jukes: 1
Everyone else: 1

[Capper]

SCG worst ground for DT scores + wet + Jack tagging him = GAJ <100 = was always going to happen

Now we laugh at everyone who picked him on this week

[SydneyRox]

lol

What were you guys saying?

Jukes i rated u higher than that. If you thought Ablett was a spud like you said then turning up before his game was the thing to do.

Hovering round waiting for a poor score this week is soft.

[Colliwobblers]

give jukes a break, not like "everybody" didn't wait until after his big round 1 game to sink the boot into jukes  ::)

i disagree with jukes but see merit in his reasoning, still i started ablett in every comp i am in and doubt i will regret it.

that said to call him a spud was a little silly and i doubt jukes actually ever thought he was/is a spud

just thought a role change in a changing side might = a decreased fantasy output from him.....   time will tell. me i doubt it will be decreased enough to warrant not selecting him but that is just my opinion.

[kilbluff1985]

he still averaging like 140 this season

[Jukes]

he still averaging like 140 this season

109.5 actually, compared to Stants' 128.5...

[SydneyRox]

give jukes a break, not like "everybody" didn't wait until after his big round 1 game to sink the boot into jukes  ::)

i disagree with jukes but see merit in his reasoning, still i started ablett in every comp i am in and doubt i will regret it.

that said to call him a spud was a little silly and i doubt jukes actually ever thought he was/is a spud

just thought a role change in a changing side might = a decreased fantasy output from him.....   time will tell. me i doubt it will be decreased enough to warrant not selecting him but that is just my opinion.

Irrespective CW.

If you want to make big calls then you need to back em up.

Week 2 is maybe still too early to call, but hows this??

GAJ will score 120+ next week and GC will win or lose by less than 2 goals.

[Justin Bieber]

Yeah I agree with SydneyRox.

Gary had an ordinary game and the spineless coward comes here and comments.

Gary will probably go 130+ again and we won't here from the kid until his next bad game.

[kilbluff1985]

he still averaging like 140 this season

109.5 actually, compared to Stants' 128.5...

you taliking about SC ?

[Jukes]

he still averaging like 140 this season

109.5 actually, compared to Stants' 128.5...

you taliking about SC ?

DT; Stants 142+115 vs Ablett 135+84


And I never exactly called Ablett a spud. He's won a Brownlow and played in 2 flags. I called his selection for dt and his dt premise for 2013 spudlike- hence the Spudlett tag.

[kilbluff1985]

Well i was talking SC

and when you say drop Spudlett you are calling him a spud whether you mean to or not

[PowerBug]

Well i was talking SC

and when you say drop Spudlett you are calling him a spud whether you mean to or not

He doesn't mean it in the same way that you think he does though, and i think alot of others are getting mixed up also. As i mentioned previously:

I'm gonna back up Jukes here. When he refers to "Spudlett" i'm sure he doesn't mean he's a "spud" player. Pretty sure he's referring to the fact that Ablett won't be worth the price tag he is given in Fantasy comps this year. He still said/says 114 average (DT), which makes him far from a spud player, but in terms of fantasy, I wouldn't want to pay 124avg for a player only to get 114avg return. And since anyone who isn't good at fantasy is known as a spud, he threw that into GAJ's name, which is fair enough imo.

:)

And ftr, yes, I picked up Stants and not GAJ. :)

[Capper]

the fact that GAJ played the swans in R2 was one of the main reasons why i didnt get him in from the start. The SCG has the lowest average for DT scores and with the added rain GAJ was always going to struggle

Yes GAJ had a great first game but the saints were no good and they helped GAJ get that high.

I think its pretty low to say that Jukes has gone missing after GAJ had a great game. He puts in a lot moire than most and commented on a lot more teams than the creator of this thread.

Wake up sunshine, not everyone got GAJ and they still went ok.