Hill vs Mitchell

[Brookesy]

Hill vs Mitchell?

Already have Wines, Viney and O'Meara.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. :)

[mabo]

If you have the money I would go with Hill.

I say that because Mitchell is starting to sound more like that player you're going to need to watch very closely to see if he's getting the green vest every week.

Hopefully he proves me wrong, but at this stage of the season that would be my personal opinion.

[hawkers65]

If i had the money i would, but sadly i'm 10k short. I'm so excited about this kid! He is fast, super-fit and a good user when not a full speed. It could be a blessing in disguise with Suckers and Young going down and leaving, because it means we can pump some games into this 19 year old. In the NAB against a full strength Rich, I believe he was BOG and showed magnificent signs for someone who only ways 78kg. In a few years time when he has put on a few kilo's and has 50 games under is belt, he will show why he was a steal at pick 33. He is also nicely under priced because of 4 out of 5 games he played last year he had the green vest.

I think Hill could play 15+ games this year for a solid average of around 70. If i had the coin i'd certainly go him over a Viney/Jones or Mitchell if vested.

P.S He is named on the wing for the Hawks this week!

[Brookesy]

Cheers guys, Hill it is!  :D

[Sandyboy]

If I could squeeze Hill in I would. Lightening quick, highly skilled, still a bit raw and can make the odd poor decision, but will provide great run from half back into the forward line. Maybe not as penetrating by foot as Suckling but a truck load quicker, a nice blend of Suckling, Dasher (RIP), and Issac Smith. At $152,000 is a bargain. He has been talked up all preseason by the club, and they believe he can really play a role.
Just my 2 cents worth, if only I had the extra cash.

[Jmachete]

I have been asking myself this question also, any more veteran coaches out there with input???

Leaning a bit toward hill myself