Keep the team as is or switch it up?

[GCSkiwi]

Hi all

Like many I've been hit by the Berger problem, but I'm actually quite tempted to leave my team how it is...

Here is the structure:
M:GAJ, Swan, Pendles, JPK, Mundy, Wines, K.Mitchell, O'Meara, (Crouch, Viney)
R: Jacobs, Berger (Rowe, Currie)
F: Buddy, Cox, Rockliff, JJK, Varcoe, Karnezis (Byrnes, Macaffer)

I wont be changing my defence at all, bold guys have already played. The option I'm considering is going Swan > Murphy, Byrnes > Neade and Berger to Goldstein. However, I'm also tempted to ride out this round, use Rowe/Cox to shift Rowe into my Rucks and put Berger on the bench, and then leave the team as it is. If Rowe gets time for Carlton he won't be a bad bench option for the forwards, and I would still have either Byrnes or Macaffer on the bench anyway. Then if Berger starts round 3/4 ish I'm not too badly off. If I wait I would at least see if he gets named round 2.

Thoughts? Switches as planned (no trades burned) or take the risk and leave Berger in?

[JimmyMcNulty]

I'd change one or two of your mid pricers in the forwards to rookies and upgrade to McEvoy or the mullet. I honestly think Byrnes won't see much of it in the forward line at Melbourne.
So yeah I think your first option seems best. Though Goldy will be a risk, could pay off because he does shine as the number 1 ruckman

[tor01doc]

I heard Neeld talk about Byrnes playing up the ground a bit on SEN this morning.

But then again, they're all playing mid this year aren't they!