Cox/Embley or Ryder/Maloney

Hammer11 · March 19, 2013, 03:32:38 AM

The final choice.
Can't afford Cox/Maloney combo unfortunately,
Thoughts?

MGK1 · March 19, 2013, 03:40:25 AM

Moloney > Embley
Cox > Ryder

Cox and Embley for me.

But I would try a slight shift to grab that extra cash to lock in Cox/Moloney

Windigo · March 19, 2013, 09:46:16 AM

Embers is in doubt for round one isn't he?

Would be a sub if he played IMO.

ronl · March 19, 2013, 09:52:23 AM

Embley did a hammy 3-4 weeks ago. Surely they wouldn't risk him in such an important game?

Jukes · March 19, 2013, 10:50:40 AM

Quote from: Hammer11 on March 19, 2013, 03:32:38 AM
The final choice.
Can't afford Cox/Maloney combo unfortunately,
Thoughts?

Cox 97, Embers 80
vs
Ryder 94, Maloney 86

(b)

eg6914 · March 19, 2013, 10:54:45 AM

As much as i hate to say it (mainly coz i am new), i agree with Jukes on this one as embley wont reach his previous heights DT wise and Ryder could look to improve his average by 5+ pushing, Top 3

Holz · March 19, 2013, 10:57:20 AM

simple as this, you cant pick embley, he just isnt ready and isnt a good pick.

you have to go with option B.

Ricochet · March 19, 2013, 12:03:06 PM

If he was fit, Embley would beat Moloney and Cox beats Ryder
I would really try and find an alternative to Embley because Cox will smash Ryder.