Main Menu

Martin on the trade table

Started by nrich102, March 15, 2013, 08:22:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ziplock

Quote from: JROO8 on November 03, 2013, 08:14:09 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on November 03, 2013, 08:07:06 PM
Quote from: RiOtChEsS on September 25, 2013, 05:52:52 PM
couple of facebook mates r talking Martin For N.Riewoldt trade in the making, cant find any article or info to back it up tho

haha, I only just saw this.

that's one of the most ridiculous proposed trades I've ever seen :P
Even more ridiculous than Nahas + a third rounder for Nroo?  :o

honestly, yes.


quinny88

Quote from: elephants on November 03, 2013, 06:27:53 PM
Haha you've got no chance now, he said in the 'NOZ' thread he will do it when he wants :P

Yeah I know, I saw that but couldn't write back because the thread got locked  ::)

It's pretty gutless by him, let's be honest

Vinny

Obviously a bet is a bet and according to the conditions brownlow votes were taken into account but Wingard has had the better year IMO.

Jroo

Quote from: Ziplock on November 03, 2013, 08:15:16 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on November 03, 2013, 08:14:09 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on November 03, 2013, 08:07:06 PM
Quote from: RiOtChEsS on September 25, 2013, 05:52:52 PM
couple of facebook mates r talking Martin For N.Riewoldt trade in the making, cant find any article or info to back it up tho

haha, I only just saw this.

that's one of the most ridiculous proposed trades I've ever seen :P
Even more ridiculous than Nahas + a third rounder for Nroo?  :o

honestly, yes.
They are both flowering ridiculous  :P ::)

T Dog


quinny88

Quote from: vinny on November 03, 2013, 08:18:55 PM
Obviously a bet is a bet and according to the conditions brownlow votes were taken into account but Wingard has had the better year IMO.

The criteria were set and agreed upon before the season started, as was the punishment.

Noz knows, he said he would do it.. But he just won't ?

TheAnt

Quote from: vinny on November 03, 2013, 08:18:55 PM
Obviously a bet is a bet and according to the conditions brownlow votes were taken into account but Wingard has had the better year IMO.
In my opinion Dustin was more consistent, Wingard had a few better games.

elephants

Quote from: TheAnt on November 03, 2013, 09:44:28 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 03, 2013, 08:18:55 PM
Obviously a bet is a bet and according to the conditions brownlow votes were taken into account but Wingard has had the better year IMO.
In my opinion Dustin was more consistent, Wingard had a few better games.

Agreed ^

IMO Dusty has been better for more sustained period against better opposition.

This is why the criteria was clearly set :P

kilbluff1985

sick of reading about this flower me

elephants

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 03, 2013, 09:47:53 PM
sick of reading about this flower me

I have this incredible process that might help you!

Step 1) Close FanFooty
Step 2) Shut your computer down
Step 3) Go outside

Problem solved! 8)

Alternatively, don't open this thread in future ;)

quinny88

Quote from: elephants on November 03, 2013, 09:51:20 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 03, 2013, 09:47:53 PM
sick of reading about this flower me

I have this incredible process that might help you!

Step 1) Close FanFooty
Step 2) Shut your computer down
Step 3) Go outside

Problem solved! 8)

Alternatively, don't open this thread in future ;)

Haha come on KB that's like walking into church and telling them you're sick of them talking about Jesus :P

This is still relevant because he still hasn't taken his punishment. What would you propose I do?  Just pretend it never happened. Frustrating because I know if it was me that lost he would have hounded me about it. And I would have done it the day I lost because I'm not a sook

Ziplock

yeah, fact is the criteria to determine who was the better/ worse player was initially agreed upon, all the criteria was given equal weighting and martin won, case closed.

If there wasn't specific criteria then it would be open to subjectivity.

for instance, martin had 5 hit outs and wingard had 2. So Martin wins the hit outs... but is winning in the hit outs as a midfielder equal to winning in the brownlow count? flower no. Hence why it wasn't regarded in the criteria.


kilbluff1985

Quote from: quinny88 on November 03, 2013, 10:03:42 PM
Quote from: elephants on November 03, 2013, 09:51:20 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 03, 2013, 09:47:53 PM
sick of reading about this flower me

I have this incredible process that might help you!

Step 1) Close FanFooty
Step 2) Shut your computer down
Step 3) Go outside

Problem solved! 8)

Alternatively, don't open this thread in future ;)

Haha come on KB that's like walking into church and telling them you're sick of them talking about Jesus :P

This is still relevant because he still hasn't taken his punishment. What would you propose I do?  Just pretend it never happened. Frustrating because I know if it was me that lost he would have hounded me about it. And I would have done it the day I lost because I'm not a sook

that's on my to do list tomorrow this was on it today

Mailman the 2nd

But Zip they could've been game changing hitouts!

TeeJay

Do people find this funny or something that he isn't doing it? It's actually a dog act and one of my pet hates, people that don't pay out on bets.
This wasn't a joke bet either. It was a heated discussion when it was made, it was thought out, it was structured with fair criteria and they even updated on it all season. wtf Noz?