Martin on the trade table

[AFEV]

Stat	Wingard	Martin	Difference
Disposals	20	21	-1
Kicks	13	12	+1
HBs	7	8	-1
Tackles	1	3	-2
Marks	4	1	+3
Goals	1	1	0
Clearances	2	2	0
I50s	5	2	0
Turnovers	2	4	-2
Eff%	80%	48%	+32
1%ers	1	0	+1

Good luck splitting them...Reckon I'd give the points to Wingard this week but honestly the difference is so small it's laughable.

BTW this thread is hilarious.

[quinny88]

Stat	Wingard	Martin	Difference
Disposals	20	21	-1
Kicks	13	12	+1
HBs	7	8	-1
Tackles	1	3	-2
Marks	4	1	+3
Goals	1	1	0
Clearances	2	2	0
I50s	5	2	0
Turnovers	2	4	-2
Eff%	80%	48%	+32
1%ers	1	0	+1

Good luck splitting them...Reckon I'd give the points to Wingard this week but honestly the difference is so small it's laughable.

BTW this thread is hilarious.

The criteria is
Brownlow votes
B&F placing
Avg disposals
Goals
SC avg
DT avg

[Noz]

21 touches with an efficiency of 48%?

Better of giving the ball to a giraffe.

Wingard taking the points in SC
Martin in DT

[pyronerd]

Stat	Wingard	Martin	Difference
Disposals	20	21	-1
Kicks	13	12	+1
HBs	7	8	-1
Tackles	1	3	-2
Marks	4	1	+3
Goals	1	1	0
Clearances	2	2	0
I50s	5	2	0
Turnovers	2	4	-2
Eff%	80%	48%	+32
1%ers	1	0	+1

Good luck splitting them...Reckon I'd give the points to Wingard this week but honestly the difference is so small it's laughable.

BTW this thread is hilarious.

need more information, cont/uncont possessions, if Wingard has a much higher % unc. then it's farily even, maybe slightly towards Martin, but if they are similar than wingard showered all over him :-X

[Ziplock]

Stat	Wingard	Martin	Difference
Disposals	20	21	-1
Kicks	13	12	+1
HBs	7	8	-1
Tackles	1	3	-2
Marks	4	1	+3
Goals	1	1	0
Clearances	2	2	0
I50s	5	2	0
Turnovers	2	4	-2
Eff%	80%	48%	+32
1%ers	1	0	+1

Good luck splitting them...Reckon I'd give the points to Wingard this week but honestly the difference is so small it's laughable.

BTW this thread is hilarious.

The criteria is
Brownlow votes
B&F placing
Avg disposals
Goals
SC avg
DT avg

if it's on B&F placing, shouldn't some weighting take place for team position?

same deal with the brownlow votes :P

like, brownlow votes are generally given out to players from winning teams, while winning the B&F in a lower ranked team isn't really equiv. to the B&F in a higher team.

or, just say that it balances out?

[quinny88]

That's just the criteria we both agreed on. Bit hard to take things like team position into account.

Noz well wingards 20 disposals were against Melbourne.. A giraffe could get 20 against them to. Don't get ahead of ya self

[elephants]

21 touches with an efficiency of 48%?

Better of giving the ball to a giraffe.

Wingard taking the points in SC
Martin in DT

Look at the contested vs uncontested possesions. Only then can you make a judgement on disposal efficiency.

[Noz]

I suppose it would be harder for Martin I mean he is doing it in a bottom 10 side.

[Bill Manspeaker]

I suppose it would be harder for Martin I mean he is doing it in a bottom 10 side.

lol do i smell another bet coming on? ;D

[Noz]

I suppose it would be harder for Martin I mean he is doing it in a bottom 10 side.

lol do i smell another bet coming on? ;D

Have a look at the ladder.

[Bill Manspeaker]

haha mate it's round 1. it doesn't worry me where they finish but i think quinny would think differently

[AFEV]

21 touches with an efficiency of 48%?

Better of giving the ball to a giraffe.

Wingard taking the points in SC
Martin in DT

Look at the contested vs uncontested possesions. Only then can you make a judgement on disposal efficiency.

Martin had 11 contested possessions versus 6 for Wingard which explains that.

Worth noting though that Wingard was playing on Watts (fws flank) for most of the game...Not a showerload of hard ball to be won when playing on Jack Watts. :-X

Like I said though can't really split these two this week..Looks like this will be decided in later rounds..

[elephants]

Watts was showerhouse hahahaha. I would have knocked up 20 odd touches on Watts yesterday :P

[AFEV]

Watts was showerhouse hahahaha. I would have knocked up 20 odd touches on Watts yesterday :P

I think that makes you better than both Martin and Wingard.. :P

[tbagrocks]

This will be interesting in July

Unless the spud gets his game on

2014 Wingard better, let's see if the Richmond idiot is any good this year, or hello Jurrah territory