Martin on the trade table

[Noz]

I am not trolling

Chad Wingard will be a better player than Dustin Martin is by the end of this year.

If any of you guys actually realise that Wingard has talent and will become one of the best players Port have ever produced.

And don't give me any stats to compare with at the same age because Wingard was our main sub target last season if the sub rule was introduced in 2010 than Martin could be effected just as much.

[Toga]

I appreciate that Wingard is a very talented youngster, saw tonnes of matches of his while he was playing for Sturt, not gonna deny that at all.

But this argument is flowering stupid if you ask me, they are different players from different backgrounds, I am sure I speak on behalf of the rest of the Tigers blokes on here that I would appreciate it if we stop trying to say that Martin is a drug-lord to be and just appreciate that he had a rough year ins 2013, lets just let him prove where his football career is this year by letting his footy do the talking.

[elephants]

Tbag, no-one listens to you because you're so bias to SA. It's actually unhealthy.

Noz, I know you're not trolling. But come on. Wingard BETTER than Martin by years end. Really.

[Noz]

Martin will be a great player no doubt about that but Wingard has already found his feet at AFL level and ready to explode. Not to mention his cousin is alright  ;)

I'm willing to put a deal out there with any Richmond supporters out there maybe all of them or even the Dusty lovers that Wingard will surpass him.

[Toga]

Who's his cousin!? :o

[Noz]

Who's his cousin!? :o

No one famous just some girl I met and apparently she was his second cousin or something.

[elephants]

I'm willing to put a deal out there with any Richmond supporters out there maybe all of them or even the Dusty lovers that Wingard will surpass him.

Well I'm neither a Tiger supporter or Dusty lover but I'll definitely keep tabs on it if someone commits ;)

[Toga]

How would you measure 'surpassing him' though...?

In terms of what?

Possessions? Games? Goals? DT Points?

[Noz]

I'm sure we could come up with a fair bet for both parties

Brownlow votes could make it interesting

[Chelskiman]

Lmao, this thread has turned into a joke.  The orignal point of the thread was laughable, then it turned to bikie gangs and now it's ended up that Wingard will be better than Martin by the end of the year.  I really can't take this seriously anymore.

[elephants]

Hahaha it's pretty funny ;D

I think Martin would beat Wingard in all those stats tbh. Also, you'd have to take into account the superior competition for votes at the Tigers...

[Noz]

Well I like how quickly all Richmond supporters called me a troll and whatnot but can't back it up with a friendly wager.

Maybe not brownlow votes but something fair.

I'm sure we can figure out who has had a better year by years end judging you treat both players the same

[Chelskiman]

So you don't want Brownlow votes and you don't want DT/SC points?  If he's as good as you say he is then both of those formats should be a piece of cake. :)

[Noz]

Well I did say we can work something out if you want DT points than lets do it.

These Richmond supporters are hard to deal with.

[TheAnt]

This has totally gotten out of hand. No one cares about your Port players, this is a Richmond topic and a completely bogus one at that. End of. You can discuss rumours and lies for the sake of it but until anythings proven you are acting like sheep.