Swan, Beams, Pendles

[Reyes]

Can someone please give me a reason why I shouldn't go with these 3 as M1, M2 and M3. I just hate the pies, but no matter how many times I look at stats I keep coming back to these 3 as my top 3 mids. I want to know if anyone has any theory why it wouldn't be a good idea to go with too many similar type players from the same team.

[Ricochet]

I have all three but also have Ablett and you need him in there somewhere.

[Chopps]

its dt dont worry if you hate the pies or not :D

watch out though for round byes with all three. but all good options

[Holz]

there is no problem having 3 collingwood players.

I woudl say dont pick beams, not because he is a bye but i just dont like spending that much cash on someone who realyl had had one premium year. would rather spend the money on a boyd type

[Reyes]

there is no problem having 3 collingwood players.

I woudl say dont pick beams, not because he is a bye but i just dont like spending that much cash on someone who realyl had had one premium year. would rather spend the money on a boyd type

Is Boyd a risk if Bulldogs are only likely to win 4 or 5 games this year though?
30 year old in a bottom 4 side vs a 23 year old in a top 4 side.

[GoLions]

there is no problem having 3 collingwood players.

I woudl say dont pick beams, not because he is a bye but i just dont like spending that much cash on someone who realyl had had one premium year. would rather spend the money on a boyd type

Is Boyd a risk if Bulldogs are only likely to win 4 or 5 games this year though?
30 year old in a bottom 4 side vs a 23 year old in a top 4 side.

Boyd killed it last year, and Bulldogs were terrible then. The same logic can be applied to Ablett, with GCS doing even worse than the dogs, but he isn't a risk because he is a gun. Same goes with Boyd.

[Windigo]

Boyd is just pure dominance, no reason he cannot go around again for 2013.  8)