Starting Whitfield, Toumpas & Wines

Started by PowerMan, March 06, 2013, 11:02:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

would you start these 3 over having a midpricer?

Yes
13 (52%)
No
12 (48%)

Total Members Voted: 0

PowerMan

I know this a bit risky, which why I like this Idea. I just think that these 3 will average more than having a midprice player in the mid5 spot

FactHunt

#1
I reckon it's less about the amount of coin these guys will make (as they each have PLENTY of upside) and more about finding places for more than 5-6 rooks in the Mids... while still gaining excellent scores from the premium Mids ( that you are paying for from M1-4/5)

FactHunt

Sorry, i re-read the post... I think that there is more upside from these guys than the money you pay for a mid-pricer... but no i don't necessarily think they will ave more than some of the options.

Vich

Toumpas and wines absolute sub candidates and whilst Whitfield isn't - still expensive and surely can't be relied upon with the giants rotations...
Mid-priced midfielders have to represent more value than those three...
Even rather field the cheaper rookies like K.Mitchell (if elevated) or J.Lonergan or M.Evans because of a seemingly less sub risk although fark knows what Nealde will do again with the Melbourne rookies this year! :o

PowerMan

Quote from: Vich on March 07, 2013, 06:53:13 AM
Toumpas and wines absolute sub candidates and whilst Whitfield isn't - still expensive and surely can't be relied upon with the giants rotations...
Mid-priced midfielders have to represent more value than those three...
Even rather field the cheaper rookies like K.Mitchell (if elevated) or J.Lonergan or M.Evans because of a seemingly less sub risk although fark knows what Nealde will do again with the Melbourne rookies this year! :o

I don't think Wines will be Sub at all, Neade has it written all over him IMO