Main Menu

JPK vs Cotch

Started by chadsta112, March 05, 2013, 07:32:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Choose one.

Trent Cotchin
17 (37%)
Josh Kennedy
29 (63%)

Total Members Voted: 1

chadsta112

Can't split these blokes. Richmond will improve which means Cotch's scores will in theory. JPK is a proven gun. Help.

jfitty

I'm really liking JPK this season. Sydney have a great start to the year draw wise, and he would be fractionally more unique than Cotchin too. He gets my vote and will easily average 120+ this season

kilbluff1985

Quote from: jfitty on March 05, 2013, 07:44:14 PM
I'm really liking JPK this season. Sydney have a great start to the year draw wise, and he would be fractionally more unique than Cotchin too. He gets my vote and will easily average 120+ this season

Yeah JPK plays GWS & GC in first 2 rounds I'd get him

gossiboy


tbagrocks

Yeah ignore the Danger comments because everyone already knows he is better

TheAnt

Hasn't this been done to death already?

Ricochet

Quote from: TheAnt on March 05, 2013, 11:09:12 PM
Hasn't this been done to death already?
Yep. Really need to use the search function fellas.
JPK for me tho

Justin Bieber

Really JPK over Cotchin? Really?

quinny88

Quote from: gossiboy on March 05, 2013, 08:01:07 PM
In before tbag and quinny go at it again.

Already been asked, just ignore the Danger comments.

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,71272.0.html

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,72505.msg997292.html#msg997292

Contrary to what you may think I'm not actually a one eyed Richmond supporter. I only have 2 Richmond players in my team.
I would take JPK over cotchin due to Sydney's soft start to the season. I have both if them anyway though.

People thinking that JPK will be unique.. Don't be so sure. He seems pretty bloody popular amongst the people on this page

tbagrocks

Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 02:59:49 AM
Really JPK over Cotchin? Really?
Really! Haven't you heard? ???  Cotchin sucks!

I'll have Joch before Trent anyday, at least untill Trent proves consistant

Justin Bieber

Quote from: tbagrocks on March 06, 2013, 07:25:37 AM
Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 02:59:49 AM
Really JPK over Cotchin? Really?
Really! Haven't you heard? ???  Cotchin sucks!

I'll have Joch before Trent anyday, at least untill Trent proves consistant
You say Danger is better and needs to show consistency. Why didn't take spud field 4 years to actually score some decent numbers?

Griffo1982

Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 01:43:15 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on March 06, 2013, 07:25:37 AM
Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 02:59:49 AM
Really JPK over Cotchin? Really?
Really! Haven't you heard? ???  Cotchin sucks!

I'll have Joch before Trent anyday, at least untill Trent proves consistant
You say Danger is better and needs to show consistency. Why didn't take spud field 4 years to actually score some decent numbers?

Didn't it take 4 years for him to finally get a full time gig in the midfield?

mark621

this will be the battle of the next perma captain
id take cotchin as a roughy to win it as well

sydney are great at sharing points and always have been

cotchin has a decent side around him and he has the talent to punch out consistant 130's to 140's with the odd 160-170 slapped in their

tbagrocks

Quote from: mark621 on March 06, 2013, 03:58:18 PM
this will be the battle of the next perma captain
id take cotchin as a roughy to win it as well

sydney are great at sharing points and always have been

cotchin has a decent side around him and he has the talent to punch out consistant 130's to 140's with the odd 160-170 slapped in their
cough *bullshower* cough

tbagrocks

Quote from: Griffo1982 on March 06, 2013, 01:51:45 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 01:43:15 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on March 06, 2013, 07:25:37 AM
Quote from: whatlez on March 06, 2013, 02:59:49 AM
Really JPK over Cotchin? Really?
Really! Haven't you heard? ???  Cotchin sucks!

I'll have Joch before Trent anyday, at least untill Trent proves consistant
You say Danger is better and needs to show consistency. Why didn't take spud field 4 years to actually score some decent numbers?

Didn't it take 4 years for him to finally get a full time gig in the midfield?
Ha I missed this, yes it did, Craig saw him as a need in the forwardline