toby greene

[Noz]

Showing someone went higher in the draft than another person isn't much to go on.

Tambling went higher than Franklin he must be better than him

Graham Polak went before Jimmy Bartel he must be better than him

Mitchell Thorp went before that current Geelong captain.

Stephen Hooper went pick one in the 1990 draft he must be way better than that guy that was picked at pick 79 whats his name i think its James Hird

[Andrew]

110 is very generous - he won't be a bad pick but that's just over the top.

The commenter you're responding to actually said "close to 110," and I would say Greene will be somewhere between 100-110 also. It isn't over the top, he averaged 96 last year?

[tbagrocks]

also Jukes how do you know the % game time of players? where do you find this?

Go into the match centre on afl.com.au. By doing this go to afl.com.au and click on one of the game links near the top. Click on one of these games, then scroll down a little bit and click on "full-time stats" then "advanced stats" in the second last column it has TOG statistics for each player who played.

You're a star Jukes.

Let's not get carried away

[elephants]

also Jukes how do you know the % game time of players? where do you find this?

Go into the match centre on afl.com.au. By doing this go to afl.com.au and click on one of the game links near the top. Click on one of these games, then scroll down a little bit and click on "full-time stats" then "advanced stats" in the second last column it has TOG statistics for each player who played.

You're a star Jukes.

Let's not get carried away

Must be a newcomer haha

[Ricochet]

To be fair, 105-110 won't be enough. Would need to go 110+ to make enough cash and be scoring enough points for you.
Even with 8 mid spots... Swan, Ablett, Beams, Pendles, Murphy, Boyd, Watson, Cotchin, Deledio, Stants, Thompson, Redden, Jelwood, Danger plus others will all average more than Greene.
No doubt is a gun kid but he's a year or two off playing with the big boys

[Holz]

To be fair, 105-110 won't be enough. Would need to go 110+ to make enough cash and be scoring enough points for you.
Even with 8 mid spots... Swan, Ablett, Beams, Pendles, Murphy, Boyd, Watson, Cotchin, Deledio, Stants, Thompson, Redden, Jelwood, Danger plus others will all average more than Greene.
No doubt is a gun kid but he's a year or two off playing with the big boys

got to agree here, most of the top players are you from the best clubs. Sure Boyd can do it, but i wouldnt like a mid premo from a side who can get crushed quite regulary

[Barra17]

In his last 9 or so games he averaged 110. It is not out of the question.

[Andrew]

After killing Sydney in the NAB Cup, I'm confident he'll put in a great showing and ton up there. His first 5 fixtures and scores against them last season are:

Sydney - 91 & 99
Port - 86
St. Kilda - 109
Melbourne - 79 & 146
Gold Coast - 96

Average from 7 games: 100.8
Take out lower scores v Sydney & Melbourne: 107.2

Only priced at an average of 97 with a heap of upside to come, he will surely do better against Port and Gold Coast this time around, and he's already gone 120+ four times last season seemingly getting better as the year went on... He's really tempting me but you guys have a strong point, got to go proven mid premiums even with 2 trades a week.

[Hagebear]

Yep, I'm sure this kid will be a fantasy beast but he won't be making my squad for a couple of years. Until he's proven 105+ then I'll consider. But for a second year player he's a freak at finding the footy.

[Toga]

His good will prob ave bout 100 mark i think for a few extra dollars somebody like murphy holds a lot more value. With 2nd year blues and a array of young midfielders that use the ball better than greene his JS is not 100% sound.

And also the fact his known now could potentially start getting tagged out of games. At this stage can't fit him in my team.

He's an accumulator of the mould of Matty Boyd, no teams will bother tagging him as it would be pretty ineffective...

That being said, probably won't make my team.