Rate my team please (3rd attempt)

[cuz_crew]

[nightwalker_1310au]

Back line strong, midfield too many pie players and not enough depth. Ruck is standard an forward line still needs working on. Rate team with solid 6.7/10 can you rate my team
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,71588.0.html

[tbagrocks]

Team sucks, I recomend you enter a phychiatric unit, but you'd be to crazy for that ::)

[tor01doc]

I love this team.

I'd march straight into Heraldsun HQ and collect 50 large.

Nice.

[Keeper27]

typical cookie cutter team.

4-4-1-4 premo structure.

no sold on broughton.
hartlett unproven
ball nice cash cow, will do well
can murphy shake the tag?
who the f*ck is growden??
nice fwd set up

iffy on jacobs after this stat.

Last year the ruckmen we are consideringhave the following stats regarding < 90 vs > 90 point games

                                     < 90              > 90
Maric                             3                    18
Roughead                     4                    16
McEvoy                        4                     12
Ryder                           4                     11
Jacobs                          6                     15

[tor01doc]

I know. I was keen but also Jenkins is quite the player too so will Jacobs' minutes be down a bit?

Starting to look elsewhere.

[nrich102]

Your teams meant to be good?
-134567/10

[LF]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Keeper27]

[Sundown24]

Funny how people seem to be abusing your team too? Sound familiar.

I don't rate Broughton and believe GC will leave him locked in defense, rather pushing Harbrow up the ground.
Hartlett is unproven and plays for Port.
Ball will score the same as Embley, so why not save $$$. Or downgrade one of your too much spent on the Super Premiums, to get two solid regular Premiums (Cotchin, Priddis, Selwood, Dangerfield etc.)
Tex Walker now gets the premier defender and won't handle it. Pass!

4/10 is a generous score