Walker and Byrnes V Cox and Daniher

The_Captain · February 28, 2013, 03:48:48 PM

Just wanted to get some Discussion going on these two options. Let us know your thoughts guys ! ;D

Toga · February 28, 2013, 03:57:38 PM

Walker (93) + Byrnes (75) = 168

Cox (101) + Daniher (62) = 163

I've got Walker and Byrnes slightly ahead of Coxy and Daniher at about 5 ppg up. Also Daniher probably won't play 22 games this year, while Coxy may also be rested depending on how the eagles are going.

The_Captain · February 28, 2013, 04:06:34 PM

Quote from: Toga on February 28, 2013, 03:57:38 PM
Walker (93) + Byrnes (75) = 168

Cox (101) + Daniher (62) = 163

I've got Walker and Byrnes slightly ahead of Coxy and Daniher at about 5 ppg up. Also Daniher probably won't play 22 games this year, while Coxy may also be rested depending on how the eagles are going.

Yeh also thinking Cox wil pump out some big scores with no Nic nat early. Then his scores will decline after that. The worry with walker is getting double teamed like Buddy. Just hope Jenkins steps it up so they have to be accountble on him as much as Walker.

Windigo · February 28, 2013, 04:26:47 PM

I'd go Cox & Daniher.

Did Daniher even play NAB round one? ???

The_Captain · February 28, 2013, 05:42:10 PM

Quote from: Windigo on February 28, 2013, 04:26:47 PM
I'd go Cox & Daniher.

Did Daniher even play NAB round one? ???

Negative. Should play this week but i would have thought?

sweathog73 · February 28, 2013, 07:08:51 PM

Cox & Daniher. There is no way Byrnes will score well as a small forward in a poor side. He averaged well years ago in a winning side. I don't understand the confidence in him. Money better spent elsewhere IMHO.

Presto · February 28, 2013, 07:25:25 PM

C&D
Cox is a proven performer, Daniher is a rookie that might or might not be successful (but I expect he will score at least 70)
Walker has never been a big DT scorer, while Byrnes will be lucky to ave 70.

Jukes · February 28, 2013, 07:36:04 PM

Tex 93, Byrnes 73
vs
Cox 97, JoeD 65

Would probably be going with Tex and Byrnes.

The_Captain · February 28, 2013, 07:48:43 PM

Or Save some coin and go Walker > Cloke. Then again, cloke is unpredictible.

RookieDTer · February 28, 2013, 07:59:15 PM

Quote from: Toga on February 28, 2013, 03:57:38 PM
Walker (93) + Byrnes (75) = 168

Cox (101) + Daniher (62) = 163

I've got Walker and Byrnes slightly ahead of Coxy and Daniher at about 5 ppg up. Also Daniher probably won't play 22 games this year, while Coxy may also be rested depending on how the eagles are going.

Or, Walker (93) + Byrnes (75+)
Cox (105) (at least, first few weeks) + Daniher (0) (at least for first few weeks.

...

Easy choice.

Though, I downgraded Walker to Cloke, and spent the money upgrading.

tbagrocks · February 28, 2013, 08:02:26 PM

Cox 98, Daniher is a bad pick

Walker 95, Byrnes ok if he goes alright the next two weeks

Get it right ::)

The_Captain · February 28, 2013, 08:10:21 PM

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 28, 2013, 08:02:26 PM
Cox 98, Daniher is a bad pick

Walker 95, Byrnes ok if he goes alright the next two weeks

Get it right ::)

Tbag thought you would be saying your man Tex would average 120 plus ahah!!!

Chopps · February 28, 2013, 08:47:19 PM

Hope Daniher plays this week will get a good chance to suss him out.

tbagrocks · February 28, 2013, 08:52:39 PM

Quote from: noto07 on February 28, 2013, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 28, 2013, 08:02:26 PM
Cox 98, Daniher is a bad pick

Walker 95, Byrnes ok if he goes alright the next two weeks

Get it right ::)

Tbag thought you would be saying your man Tex would average 120 plus ahah!!!

SuperCoach ;)

Toga · February 28, 2013, 08:55:27 PM

Quote from: noto07 on February 28, 2013, 07:48:43 PM
Or Save some coin and go Walker > Cloke. Then again, cloke is unpredictible.

Walkers like 50K more expensive than cloke lol! :o

Although that is a reasonable point....

What about Cloke + JJ Kennedy?! :o