I'll predict your teams' Average Score

Started by essendon2, February 26, 2013, 07:33:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

essendon2

So you've opened this and now you're saying "what do you know, why should you judge mine?"

Well I will provide a fair, unbias judgement on your team, this is similar to Jukes' scoring system however I'll be predicting the averages. Windigo, for one is against predictions, but I love getting the Calculator out and evaluating my teams' potential score every few changes ;)

So go ahead and start posting your teams, and let me predict away.

I'll start.

DEF: Goddard (100), Grimes (95), Gibbs (105), Hartlett (90), Tambling (75), Pittard (65)

MID: Swan (260), Ablett (120), Pendlebury (116), Moloney (90), Embley (85), Wines (80), J. Lonergan (75), K. Mitchell (70)

RUC: McEvoy (95), Leuenberger (85)

FWD: Rockliff (110), Zorko (100), N. Riewoldt (95; first 5 rounds), Wright (95), Cloke (90), Varcoe (75)

Total = 2171

blues boy

Def: Goddard, Gibbs, Heppel, Hartlett, Pittard, Goodes
Mids: Swan (c), Boyd, Pendlebury, Murphy, Moloney, Embley, K. Mitchell, J. O'meara
Ruck: Maric, Leunenberger
Fwds: Cox, Rockliff, Robbo, Sylvia, Varcoe, Macaffer

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on February 26, 2013, 07:33:19 PM
So you've opened this and now you're saying "what do you know, why should you judge mine?"

Well I will provide a fair, unbias judgement on your team, this is similar to Jukes' scoring system however I'll be predicting the averages. Windigo, for one is against predictions, but I love getting the Calculator out and evaluating my teams' potential score every few changes ;)

So go ahead and start posting your teams, and let me predict away.

I'll start.

DEF: Goddard (100), Grimes (95), Gibbs (105), Hartlett (90), Tambling (75), Pittard (65)

MID: Swan (260), Ablett (120), Pendlebury (116), Moloney (90), Embley (85), Wines (80), J. Lonergan (75), K. Mitchell (70)

RUC: McEvoy (95), Leuenberger (85)

FWD: Rockliff (110), Zorko (100), N. Riewoldt (95; first 5 rounds), Wright (95), Cloke (90), Varcoe (75)

Total = 2171
I thought the mids and backs were about right... mcevoy might be a touch high... and then you got to zorko at 100 and wright at 95. :P

rebird

DEF: B. Goddard, B. Gibbs, D. Heppell, M. Golby, B. Jacobs, J. Pittard (B. Goodes, S. Docherty)
MID: D. Swan, S. Selwood, D. Rich, J. Steven, L. Parker, A. Embley, J. Lonergan, B. Crouch (J. O'Meara, J. Viney)
RUC: J. Griffin, M. Leuenberger (M. Daw, S. Rowe)
FWD: D. Cox, T. Rockliff, N. Riewoldt, M. Wright, A. Siposs, T. Varcoe (B. Macaffer, S. Kerridge)

essendon2

Quote from: blues boy on February 26, 2013, 07:43:47 PM
Def: Goddard, Gibbs, Heppel, Hartlett, Pittard, Goodes
Mids: Swan (c), Boyd, Pendlebury, Murphy, Moloney, Embley, K. Mitchell, J. O'meara
Ruck: Maric, Leunenberger
Fwds: Cox, Rockliff, Robbo, Sylvia, Varcoe, Macaffer
Def: Goddard 100, Gibbs 105, Heppell 92, Hartlett 90, Pittard 65, Goodes 65
Mids: Swan (c) 260, Boyd 115, Pendlebury 116, Murphy 110, Moloney 90, Embley 85, K. Mitchell 70, J. O'meara 70
Ruck: Maric 100, Leunenberger 85
Fwds: Cox 99, Rockliff 110, Robbo 98, Sylvia 90, Varcoe 75, Macaffer 70

Total = 2160

essendon2

Quote from: rebird on February 26, 2013, 08:10:51 PM
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Gibbs, D. Heppell, M. Golby, B. Jacobs, J. Pittard (B. Goodes, S. Docherty)
MID: D. Swan, S. Selwood, D. Rich, J. Steven, L. Parker, A. Embley, J. Lonergan, B. Crouch (J. O'Meara, J. Viney)
RUC: J. Griffin, M. Leuenberger (M. Daw, S. Rowe)
FWD: D. Cox, T. Rockliff, N. Riewoldt, M. Wright, A. Siposs, T. Varcoe (B. Macaffer, S. Kerridge)
DEF: B. Goddard 100, B. Gibbs 105, D. Heppell 92, M. Golby 85, B. Jacobs 83, J. Pittard 65
MID: D. Swan 260, S. Selwood 108, D. Rich 96, J. Steven 95, L. Parker 85?, A. Embley 85, J. Lonergan 75, B. Crouch 70
RUC: J. Griffin 85, M. Leuenberger 85
FWD: D. Cox 99, T. Rockliff 110, N. Riewoldt 95, M. Wright 95, A. Siposs 83, T. Varcoe 75

Total = 2141

Justin Bieber

Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.

Adamant

Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2013, 08:36:54 PM
Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.

Finally someone agrees that Siposs is overrated. I reckon he'll only be around the 75 mark...

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Adamant on February 26, 2013, 08:39:18 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2013, 08:36:54 PM
Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.

Finally someone agrees that Siposs is overrated. I reckon he'll only be around the 75 mark...
I've gone on record that Siposs is the most overrated player on this website. Lol.

blues boy

Quote from: essendon2 on February 26, 2013, 08:22:26 PM
Quote from: blues boy on February 26, 2013, 07:43:47 PM
Def: Goddard, Gibbs, Heppel, Hartlett, Pittard, Goodes
Mids: Swan (c), Boyd, Pendlebury, Murphy, Moloney, Embley, K. Mitchell, J. O'meara
Ruck: Maric, Leunenberger
Fwds: Cox, Rockliff, Robbo, Sylvia, Varcoe, Macaffer
Def: Goddard 100, Gibbs 105, Heppell 92, Hartlett 90, Pittard 65, Goodes 65
Mids: Swan (c) 260, Boyd 115, Pendlebury 116, Murphy 110, Moloney 90, Embley 85, K. Mitchell 70, J. O'meara 70
Ruck: Maric 100, Leunenberger 85
Fwds: Cox 99, Rockliff 110, Robbo 98, Sylvia 90, Varcoe 75, Macaffer 70

Total = 2160

Cheers mate! They all look reasonable scores i think O'meara may get the vest in that case he may drop 20-30 but still agree with the rest!

essendon2

Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2013, 08:36:54 PM
Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.
hm well clearly they picked them because they think they'll do well, so I'll back the buyers of the players!

blues boy

Quote from: Adamant on February 26, 2013, 08:39:18 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2013, 08:36:54 PM
Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.

Finally someone agrees that Siposs is overrated. I reckon he'll only be around the 75 mark...

I agree 70 - 75 player i reckon

Football Factory

From memory Siposs averaged 80 without the vest .. so i didnt think it was a bad guestimation ..

Justin Bieber

Quote from: essendon2 on February 26, 2013, 08:41:30 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2013, 08:36:54 PM
Wow some poor judgement.

Ben Jacobs 83 is appalling. Sipooss 83 lol.
hm well clearly they picked them because they think they'll do well, so I'll back the buyers of the players!
If you think Jacobs will ave 83 then he has be a massive lock.

Adamant

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on February 26, 2013, 08:42:41 PM
From memory Siposs averaged 80 without the vest .. so i didnt think it was a bad guestimation ..

But that was only from 6 games FF.