Everyone is talking about Embly, Moloney or Ball.. What about this guy?

Shanus_ · February 24, 2013, 11:30:19 PM

Nick Lower.

Whats everyone's opinion about Lower? He is in the same ball park in price, worth 352k, averaged 97.6 last year from 3 games and is only 25.. Anyone think he can push 95+ for the year? Played well in NAB Cup week 1 with a 55 and a 23..

Thoughts?

dmac07 · February 24, 2013, 11:38:27 PM

Currently in my side at M5, hoping for big things.

lazarel · February 24, 2013, 11:58:24 PM

Awkward price wish he was 250k, would be in my team in a heartbeat.

devilvivi · February 25, 2013, 12:14:56 AM

Shhh guys... but yeah I rate him, he didn't get a game with us last year because of concussions and Ross just prefered Clancee and de Boer over him by the time he was good again. Keen to see him get another chance

Noz · February 25, 2013, 12:28:59 AM

Bulldogs midfield is going to be like a Chinese train this season very packed and difficult to get into. (Hopefully that sounds PGish)

Either way I would like to hear what the bulldogs fans think about him and Koby Stevens who is more likely to get game time. Especially with Clay Smith improving.

essendon2 · February 25, 2013, 08:40:25 AM

Clay Smith, now keep him quiet because he's what you call a smokey

Windigo · February 25, 2013, 10:26:53 AM

Not for me. Too much coin TBH. :-\

Colliwobblers · February 25, 2013, 10:29:12 AM

one more year i think... still could make some serious coin of him this season if he cements a spot.

Holz · February 25, 2013, 10:48:37 AM

not for 90k more than embley.

as Noz has said the dogs have alot of mids, the only guy I woudl feel safe with would be boydy.

Colliwobblers · February 26, 2013, 01:47:47 AM

Get Scully - he has matched Cotchins numbers every year for year. We all know what happened to Cotchin in the year Scully is going into now.

I'm not getting Scully but I am going to regret it if he pulls a Cotchin - Massive preseason by all reports it is coming....

A lot dearer than Lower tho so I should probably just :-X

tbagrocks · February 26, 2013, 01:53:35 AM

Trengove's better than Skully and Skully's better than Cotchin ::)

But I still think Skully could be worth it, has to rise in value

Colliwobblers · February 26, 2013, 02:05:54 AM

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 26, 2013, 01:53:35 AM
Trengove's better than Skully and Skully's better than Cotchin ::)

But I still think Skully could be worth it, has to rise in value

Cotchin 69-68-74-94-111 ( pick #2 )

Skully 79-77-74- ? ( pick #1 )

Trengove 76-90-76- ? ( pick #2 )

No surprises at all if both these guys go 90+ but who will be brave enough to start either?

tbagrocks · February 26, 2013, 02:06:48 AM

I'd agree but ...............................................................

tbagrocks · February 26, 2013, 02:10:20 AM

Melbourne tanked to get both picks

Anyone anywhere if only the number one pick would not take Scully

Trengove was the best player in the draft

Melbourne took Skully because they had Trengove locked at 2, because Tom was the Victorian he went first

We all knew Jack was better, dirty vicks >:(

Ziplock · February 26, 2013, 02:17:30 AM

Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 26, 2013, 02:05:54 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 26, 2013, 01:53:35 AM
Trengove's better than Skully and Skully's better than Cotchin ::)

But I still think Skully could be worth it, has to rise in value

Cotchin 69-68-74-94-111 ( pick #2 )

Skully 79-77-74- ? ( pick #1 )

Trengove 76-90-76- ? ( pick #2 )

No surprises at all if both these guys go 90+ but who will be brave enough to start either?

tag me in.

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 26, 2013, 02:10:20 AM
Melbourne tanked to get both picks

Anyone anywhere if only the number one pick would not take Scully

Trengove was the best player in the draft

Melbourne took Skully because they had Trengove locked at 2, because Tom was the Victorian he went first

We all knew Jack was better, dirty vicks >:(

when a team has back to back picks, whoever gets taken first doesn't really matter.

at this point, both of them are coming off extremely average seasons.