Byrnes vs Varcoe

elephants · February 23, 2013, 01:31:45 AM

Many teams I've seen have Wines at m5 soo really its no biggie.

RookieDTer · February 23, 2013, 01:40:20 AM

Quote from: Thunderstruck on February 22, 2013, 10:39:56 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 22, 2013, 09:34:45 PM
Quote from: Windigo on February 22, 2013, 09:02:12 PM
Byrnes for me.

But I've got both. :P
+1

+2 presently sitting as F5 and F6 with Caff and Neade on the bench

SAme, but, Caff and Lee on Bench :)

Juddster5 · February 23, 2013, 01:59:43 AM

There is nothing wrong with having Embley at M5. He could quite easily average 85+ this season if not more.

Scrads · February 23, 2013, 03:15:07 AM

I have Knights, Varcoe and Byrnes as my F4,5,6.

Have 4 premo backs.

Have 4 premo mids + D.Swallow + Embley

With Cox in the ruck with Leuy.

Andrew · February 23, 2013, 04:05:51 PM

Quote from: Scrads on February 23, 2013, 03:15:07 AM
I have Knights, Varcoe and Byrnes as my F4,5,6.

I can only squeeze 2 in, Varcoe looks the goods with dual position but Knights or Byrnes? Can't figure it out.

dillez · February 23, 2013, 04:21:42 PM

I have fyfe at M5 and varcoe at F4 I am not sure which way ill go, with fyfe/embley at M5, having swallow in your mids is pretty risky

essendon2 · February 23, 2013, 04:25:26 PM

Quote from: Chopps on February 23, 2013, 01:10:06 AM
Quote from: Nails on February 23, 2013, 12:52:54 AM
Embley at m5... so a weak midfield it is. That's a terrible midfield if you have Embley at 5.

i hope thats sarcasm because embley at 5 is quite reasonable

Embley at 5 is bloody fine.....
MIDS have strongest rooks, you'd only want to be fielding 0-1 rooks in FWD and 1-2 in DEF