O.Wines or K.Mitchell

[Rowy]

I believe that both players will be selected for round 1, i only want to choose 1 player. Any suggestions

[quinny88]

Mitchell is about 40k cheaper so that makes him more favourable.
I have both

[yorgis]

mitch needs to be elevated off the rookie list for LTI victim  nick salter

[dmac07]

I think both are good picks, if I had to choose one (if both named rnd 1) I would go mitchell, think he can potentially be one of the better scornig rookies and possibly push 80ppg.

Its tough with Port though. Currently I have Pittard, Mitchell and Neade, throw Wines in, and I dont think all of them can play, but all seem good options.

[dejan]

id go mitchel he just looks the part and has the form from the wafl and soliddd build good footy brain to

[morgs640]

I think you definitely need to have both

[MC]

Mitchell - 40k cheaper, more mature body, has played senior footy before. I think he'll be the more consistent scorer.

[GM]

I have both atm,but i would choose Wines first

[sweathog73]

Good problem for Port Adelaide to have!  :D

[Jroo]

If I had to only pick one then, Mitchell.
Is older, Less of a sub risk, Cheaper, Better scoring potential.
So Mitchell for me, but it wouldn't be so bad if you have both.

[mjpaps]

Both will be handy picks.
I have both in my side atm...
I reckon Mitchell tho just because of his size & age.
However, when will he be / or can he be elevated to the senior list?

[Hagebear]

Mitchell solely on price.but I think u should have both if u can fit it in.

[Dudge]

I have both atm, and if both are picked rd1, i'd be quite happy to start with both. Most are saying Mitchell has a more mature body, age tells us that, but Ollie got a decent frame aswell

[quinny88]

People referring to Mitchells body size as an advantage obviously havent seen Wines  :o The kid is a beast

[Ringo]

I would try and get both as well - Wines looks ready for AFL despite being younger than Mitchell.  I would have no qualms starting both if both named Round 1,