Stevie J ---> N.Roo

Started by Money, February 19, 2013, 03:23:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Money

I've hopped on the band wagon and gone from about rounds 1-4  N.Roo then get Johnson back in after that, with my forward already looking like Johnson, Rockliff, Martin, Varcoe, Byrnes, Macaffer will I start off too weak????

(yes, i am aware stevie j is back round 2)

Nails


Money


Ricochet

Quite a few are looking like doing something similar.
Personally I won't be, the risks are just to high imo.

Adamant

Quote from: Ricochet on February 19, 2013, 03:38:30 AM
Quite a few are looking like doing something similar.
Personally I won't be, the risks are just to high imo.

Agree with Ric here. Whilst I don't mind the idea of starting with NRoo for his easy draw early, it could easily backfire big time.

I just don't think it's worth the risk tbh.

Nails


elephants

Nah never been a fan of this but I know that a lot of people are.

High risk, high reward.

You could find yourself out in front of the pack early or chasing the pack for the rest of the year.

Up to you mate... Could make or break your season though!

Capper

Well if Stevie J is back R2 then start NROO and if he fails R1 then go to Stevie R2

tbagrocks

Bah, I am so pissed that Nat and SJ won't be round one, flower there goes any early advantage

Now all that's left it to convince the noobs to take Pav, Chappy, Thomas or Buddy for round one

Windigo

N Roo at F2?  ???

No deal IMO.

elephants

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 19, 2013, 04:42:52 AM
Bah, I am so pissed that Nat and SJ won't be round one, flower there goes any early advantage

Now all that's left it to convince the noobs to take Pav, Chappy, Thomas or Buddy for round one

Haha why mate? Who are you hiding??

Ziplock


tbagrocks

Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2013, 01:37:39 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 19, 2013, 04:42:52 AM
Bah, I am so pissed that Nat and SJ won't be round one, flower there goes any early advantage

Now all that's left it to convince the noobs to take Pav, Chappy, Thomas or Buddy for round one

Haha why mate? Who are you hiding??
Nothing special, Robbo, Wright, Dusty and the great man are better picks, all under priced and can be in or abouts the top 6

I wanted people to take Nic Nat even though he won't have much better stats and not DT worthy, SJ is usually a slow starter and a rick of rests during the year, so the over spending on these players gave me an advantage :-\

Holz

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 19, 2013, 02:19:14 PM
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2013, 01:37:39 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 19, 2013, 04:42:52 AM
Bah, I am so pissed that Nat and SJ won't be round one, flower there goes any early advantage

Now all that's left it to convince the noobs to take Pav, Chappy, Thomas or Buddy for round one

Haha why mate? Who are you hiding??
Nothing special, Robbo, Wright, Dusty and the great man are better picks, all under priced and can be in or abouts the top 6

I wanted people to take Nic Nat even though he won't have much better stats and not DT worthy, SJ is usually a slow starter and a rick of rests during the year, so the over spending on these players gave me an advantage :-\

i thought you meant there goes your advantage as you had them locked in. SJ is a great pick could be the number 1 forward easy.


SydneyRox

Quote from: Windigo on February 19, 2013, 11:37:11 AM
N Roo at F2?  ???

No deal IMO.

Agree - if he sits at F3 or F4 and then you have the cash leftover to upgrade to SJ in round 2-3 I dont mind it, but Nroo at F2 is way too risky